Meaning of size in subatomic

  • Thread starter kwestion
  • Start date
  • #1
63
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

What is, and is not meant, by size when it comes to the subatomic world?

The FAQ's of this forum, and a wikipedia article I read recently seem to agree that "the very notion of a discrete 'particle' has been ultimately replaced by the concept of something like wave-packet of an uncertain boundary".

I think I like that statement, but I still read from time to time that subatomic particle P has size less than 10^-M meters, for example. How would one conclude that without assuming a certain boundary? In what ways do these size statements have meaning and in what ways do they not have meaning subatomically?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
249
0
I think that a good measure for the size of a particle is the size of an area where the probability density of subparticles (that construct the original particle) is high enough. Example are atomic orbitals: they are defined as the volume that has 95% chance to contain electron (although complete definition should also say that the volume drops 5% of the space with minimal probability density).
 
  • #3
63
0
Okay, that sounds reasonable for compound particles.
If I have an elementary subparticle, say, a standalone electron. I think I'm supposed to be able to accept a zero, point-like width on one hand, and also accept an uncertain boundary on the other hand. A point seems to be an absolutely certain boundary, so I don't understand the apparent conflict in the language.
 

Related Threads for: Meaning of size in subatomic

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
2K
Top