Measure of Distance to Stars

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of standard distances and whether they take into account Earth's velocity and gravitation or not. It also considers the effect of Earth's velocity on the length-contraction factor within the Milky Way. The follow-up question asks about the percent change in distance if standard frames are or are not used. The conversation also clarifies that the big bang theory is not about an explosion in space, but rather a limit where the time coordinate goes to zero.
  • #1
Wizardsblade
148
0
When a star or galaxy etc is said to be 10 light years away is that from a standard Earth's velocity distance (ie without length contraction) or do we take into account Earth's velocity and gravitation and have a standard length (maybe accordance with the milkyway being stationary or if we perhaps know about where the big bang was and derive a standard distance from its stationary frame.) A follow up question would be What percent distance would be changed if we did/did not use such frames for standard distances?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For a crude estimate of these effects within the Milky Way at least, consider that the speed of the solar system with respect to the center of the galaxy is about 220 km/sec, according to http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761558916/milky_way.html. What length-contraction factor does this speed produce?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Wizardsblade said:
...if we perhaps know about where the big bang was...
The big bang didn't happen at a point in space, and isn't an event in space-time. It's just a name for the limit where the time coordinate of a certain coordinate system goes to zero. The distance between any two objects with constant spatial coordinates in that coordinate system goes to zero in that limit. That's what the "big bang theory" is about. It's not about an explosion somewhere in space.
 

1. What is the closest star to Earth?

The closest star to Earth is the Sun, which is about 93 million miles away. It is considered a star because it is a massive, luminous sphere of plasma held together by its own gravity.

2. How do scientists measure the distance to stars?

Scientists use a variety of methods to measure the distance to stars, including parallax, spectroscopy, and variable stars. Parallax involves measuring the shift in a star's position as the Earth orbits around the Sun. Spectroscopy involves analyzing the star's light to determine its temperature, composition, and brightness. Variable stars are stars whose brightness changes over time, and their patterns can be used to calculate their distance.

3. What is the unit of measurement used for distances to stars?

The unit of measurement used for distances to stars is light-years. One light-year is the distance that light travels in one year, which is about 9.46 trillion kilometers or 5.88 trillion miles. This unit is used because distances to stars are so vast that using kilometers or miles would be impractical.

4. How far can scientists currently measure the distance to stars?

Scientists can currently measure the distance to stars up to about 10,000 light-years away using parallax and spectroscopy. However, with the development of new technology and techniques, this distance limit is constantly expanding.

5. Why is measuring the distance to stars important?

Measuring the distance to stars is important for understanding the scale of the universe and the properties of stars. It allows scientists to classify and study different types of stars, determine their ages and sizes, and track the evolution of the universe. It also helps in the search for habitable planets and potential extraterrestrial life.

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
544
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
841
Replies
63
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
797
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
836
Back
Top