Membrane Potential

  1. In membrane potential determination of a cell, the Goldman Hodgkin Katz equation says the contribution of an ion to diffusion potential is dependent on its membrane permeability.
    So in case an ion, one that has a zero permeability, is present outside the cell, using the equation , one will get contribution to diffusion potential as zero but thinking rationally, the charge on the ion must contribute to the electrical potential across the membrane.
    Though I see that the equation is meant for diffusion potential, I see that the same equation is being used to find the resting membrane potential.

    Here my questions are
    1. Are membrane potential and net diffusion potential the same?
    2. Isn't there any contribution to membrane Potential by an ion with zero permeability? If so how? Is there a different equation for it? Or will its presence influence the membrane permeability for other ions and thus have an effect?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. atyy

    atyy 9,940
    Science Advisor

    Usually we assume that the bulk of the solution starts off neutral, eg. the solution could be A+B- both inside and outside the cell. Let's suppose AB has a high concentration inside the cell and a low concentration outside. If there is a concentration difference across an impermeable membrane, then since no ions can move, both sides will stay neutral, and there will be no membrane potential difference.

    If the membrane is permeable to A and impermeable to B, then A will try to diffuse down the concentration gradient from the inside of the cell to the outside of the cell. This will cause a net positive charge inside the cell and a net negative charge outside the cell. This charge excess will try to couteract the diffusion of A, since negatively charged A will be attracted back to the now positive environment inside the cell. The steady membrane potential occurs when the excess positive charge caused inside the cell exactly balances the tendency of A to diffuse out of the cell according to the concentration gradient.

    Together, these two pictures are why we only put (explicitly) the permeable ions into the equation. You can also see by this reasoning that if A and B were both permeable, then both would diffuse together down the concentration gradient, and there would be no electric charge separation.

    One approximation we usually make is that in principle the diffusion of A from the inside to the outside changes the concentration in the cell. But we ignore this because it takes relatively few ions to move across the cell membrane to cause a big membrane potential difference, and these few ions don't change the concentrations inside and outside by much.

    These approximations can break down, but they illustrate why impermeable ions don't have to be explicitly considered in most approximations.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2013
  4. Andy Resnick

    Andy Resnick 5,785
    Science Advisor

    Consider soluble proteins- they have lots of negative charge but cannot leave the cell. This leads to movement of *water* across the membrane (Donnan equilibrium). Small ions will move down their concentration gradient until a final equilibrium concentration and membrane potential is reached for each semipermeable ion species (GHZ equations) and water will move until the osmotic gradient and hydrostatic gradient are equalized.

    As a specific example, consider the extracellular space to initially have 150mM of NaCl and the cytosol to have [Na+] = 150 mM, [Cl-] = 0 mM, and [protein] = 1mM = 150 mEq (each protein molecule has 150 negative charges). Initially, Cl moves down the concentration gradient into the cell, which draws additional Na in to maintain electroneutrality. Final equilibrium is reached when the extracellular space has [Na] = [Cl] = 100mM and the cytosol has [Na] = 200 mM, [Cl] = 50 mM, the membrane potential is -18.4 mV (cell is negative) and the hydrostatic pressure jump is 967 mmHg (cell is positive).
     
  5. somasimple

    somasimple 716
    Gold Member

    Last edited: Jul 20, 2013
  6. It's not really dependent on volumes. The intracellular compartment has a net negative charge relative to the extracellular compartment. This is due in part to the net negative charge of intracellular proteins which cannot diffuse across cell membranes. In addition the sodium-potassium ATP dependent pumps actively maintain low intracellular sodium vs potassium concentrations while the relative concentration of these cations is reversed in the extracellular compartment. By actively pumping sodium out of the cell, this helps to maintain a net negative intracellular charge because potassium can passively diffuse out the cells (following the concentration gradient) which tends to lower the overall cation concentration inside the cell.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2013
  7. somasimple

    somasimple 716
    Gold Member

    It contradicts how Donnan equilibrium is computed. Working with concentrations may lose the dimensional aspect of the phenomenon.
     
  8. Last edited: Jul 20, 2013
  9. somasimple

    somasimple 716
    Gold Member

    The second sentence does not change the computation of the equilibrium neither the involved volumes.
     
  10. So what's your point? Are you interested in how cells work or how a model works?

    "Ion transporters are divided into pumps and exchangers, but in all cases the duty of the
    transporter is to move specific ions against their electrochemical gradients in order to
    maintain a non-equilibrium steady state, such as the resting membrane potential." (Section 2.4 of the link in post 7.)
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2013
  11. somasimple

    somasimple 716
    Gold Member

    Both. A model may describe how a cell works.
     
  12. Yes, but not the Donnan equilibrium model.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2013
  13. somasimple

    somasimple 716
    Gold Member

    So, are you saying that the second response describes "how a cell works" with a model that does not describe "how a cell works"?
    BTW, the first reply is based upon a " common" cell model. This one is far from the second.
     
  14. I can only speak for my own responses. I described basically how the cell works in this regard in post 5. If you have some disagreement with this description, specifically point it out based on acceptable science. Otherwise I would advise that you cease this argumentative and seemingly pointless line of discussion.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2013
  15. Andy Resnick

    Andy Resnick 5,785
    Science Advisor

    I'm not entirely sure what you are asking.
     
  16. It seems somasimple doesn't understand that there is no final electrochemical equilibrium state with regard to the animal cell except with cell death. The living cell functions in a non-equilibrium steady state between the intracellular and extracellular compartments as I've tried to explain. If the sodium-potassium pumps were poisoned and failed to function, sodium and water would diffuse in, potassium would diffuse out, and the cells of the body would expand and probably lyse. If one wants a purely passive diffusion model, that's a question for physics, not biology.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2013
  17. somasimple

    somasimple 716
    Gold Member

    Things that are clearly stated may be easily understood.

    1/ In your example, the extracellular space is 150mM of NaCl at start.
    2/ In your example, the extracellular space is 100mM of NaCl at End.
    3/ You have diluted the extracellular content/volume with the content/volume of the cell.
    4/ There is a problem of scale/volume in your explanation because the concentration of the extracellular space/volume can't be changed/modified by a concentration of a volume that is million and million time smaller.
     
    Last edited: Jul 29, 2013
  18. Andy Resnick

    Andy Resnick 5,785
    Science Advisor

    I see your error(s)- in my example, ions are transported into the cell; this is not the same thing as the transport of water into the extracellular space. Also, in normal physiological systems, there is not a single cell in an infinite reservoir; for example an epithelial cell layer develops directed ion transport and forms a physical/functional barrier between two extracellular compartments; osmotic differences across the cell membrane as well as transepithelial are balanced by electrochemical differences and not hydraulic gradients. These gradients are maintained as long as the cell/tissue is alive and hydrolyzing ATP.

    Now, consider a single cell organism: yeast, bacteria, algae, etc. These organisms have additional structures to resist osmotic pressure- a rigid cell wall, for example. Putting an isolated mammalian cell into a hypo- or hyperosmotic solution results in cell swelling/dehydration and cell death.

    Does this help?
     
  19. Andy Resnick

    Andy Resnick 5,785
    Science Advisor

    Agreed.
     
  20. somasimple

    somasimple 716
    Gold Member

    Firstly I must thank you since you brought a bit of osmosis in the model. It is sure the movement of the solvent (water) is yet underestimated.
    Thanks again to point out a mistake I made but it does not change the problem at all.
    Effectively, you may dilute a solution by adding some solvent and there will be a change in its volume.

    You may, also, dilute a solution by removing/transporting some quantity of its content, as in your example. The external volume remains unchanged but I'm quite sure there's not enough room in a cell to move such a quantity of ions. The internal concentration will reach some summits, alas unknown, in physiological models or alive ones.
    I'm sure you'll find another faulty point in this argument...
    Also, I'm glad you introduce a more physiological model but epithelium is a very specialized cells tissue that is in direct contact with environment. It has functions and properties that are far from our simple cell model.
    Also, the cell models described in books are constructed/based on a relation 1 to 1.
    A cell tissue brings a new relation: 1 to n and some properties that worked with the previous relation may not work anymore.
    Thus, you can't put the blame on me since I was not aware of such a model AND this model is not the subject of this thread.
    I think it does not help since cell volume variations exist and are the proof of a perfect functioning and a fate of life. Cells may swell without a chance of death.
    Here is a very common example: neurons.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1458751/
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201844/
    Unfortunately, water movement (and all concentrations changes that happen with such changes) are not integrated, yet, in a more physiological cell model.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2013
  21. Andy Resnick

    Andy Resnick 5,785
    Science Advisor

    The family of water channels (aquaporins) are well-studied- Peter Agre received a Nobel for discovering them. Water permeability of tissue is also fairly well-measured.

    Maybe I don't understand your questions? Complaining about a simplified model presented in a textbook is hardly sporting.....
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

0
Draft saved Draft deleted