When applying GR to calculate Mercury's precession, the result is 43 arcseconds which coincides with the part of observed precession unexplained by newtonian theory . My question is: why the formula from GR gives precisely this unexpained 43 arcseconds and not the total observed precession of 5600 arcseconds per century as if the calculation had implicit the rest of approximations? I guess it is the way the GR derivation is set up but I'm curious abot how exactly.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Mercury's precession

Loading...

Similar Threads - Mercury's precession | Date |
---|---|

A Perihelion precession in GR using Robertson expansion | May 25, 2017 |

I Mercury precession | Dec 13, 2016 |

I GR and Mercury precession | Aug 8, 2016 |

Precession of Mercury | Mar 17, 2012 |

Precession of Mercury | Jan 14, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**