Méré's Paradox

  • Thread starter karambos
  • Start date
  • #1
1
0
TASK: Show that throwing at least one "6" within 4 throws of a die is more likely than throwing a "double 6" within 24 throws of two dice.

SOLUTION: I can do the first result two ways. Firstly, I can use the complement of "four dice all showing something other than six" which would be 1 - ((5/6)^4) = 51,7%. Or I can use the long-winded version of

Binomial[4, 1]*((5/6)^3)*((1/6))^1) +
Binomial[4, 2]*((5/6)^2)*((1/6))^2) +
Binomial[4, 3]*((5/6)^1)*((1/6))^3) +
Binomial[4, 4]*((5/6)^0)*((1/6))^4)

= 51,7%

which translated into words is roughly: "the chances of selecting 1 from 4 multiplied by the chances of three dice showing not six multiplied by the chances of one die showing six PLUS the chances of selecting two from 4 etc etc"

I can show the second part by using the complement of "no six or exactly one six" which is 1 - ((5/6)^12) - (Binomial[12,1])*(5/6)^11)*(1/6)

MY QUESTION: if I were insane enough (which I am, believe me :eek: ) to want to solve the second part using the "long-winded" binomial version, how would I do it?

I'm gratefu for any help
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
644
1
P(getting a double 6) = 1/36
P(in 24 throws , no double throws) = (35/36)^24
P(getting atleast 1 double throw in 24 throws)
= 1-(35/36)^24
approx .491 or 49.1%

Hence the result

-- AI
 

Related Threads on Méré's Paradox

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
692
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
Top