Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Lounge
Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Methodology / Philosophy of Science
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Prishon, post: 6530629, member: 693439"] I think this philosophy of science offers a very limited view on the real progress of science. Scientific progress and the workings of the sciences cannot be explained or described in a scientific/ philosophical framework. If applied to real science and all practitioners would adapt this view, science would come to a sqeacking halt. Or maybe some very limited progress would be observed. But it is a nice view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
The Lounge
Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Methodology / Philosophy of Science
Back
Top