To have a connection in GR one imposes several conditions. Among others, one condition is that the connection shall be torsion free, which leads to symmetric Christoffel symbols. My understanding is that this condition is imposed to maintain the theory as simple as possible. The absence of this condition would imply some physical phenomenon (spacetime with torsion, additionally to curvature), which is not observed (?).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Further, one imposes metric compatibility, which leads to a vanishing covariant derivative of the metric. I assume that the reasons which make this property desirable are the same as above, but I cannot imagine any physical phenomenon related to the absence of this condition. So, my question is: what is the physical interpretation of a connection which is not compatible with the metric? I read in Sean Carrolls GR notes (p. 91), that to introduce fermions in GR one has to make use of a connection which is not metric compatible (called spin connection), why?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Metric compatibile connection

Loading...

Similar Threads - Metric compatibile connection | Date |
---|---|

I Some geometry questions re Swartzchild metric | Friday at 9:27 AM |

I Measured intervals in metrics | Mar 6, 2018 |

I FRW metric derivation: constraints from isotropic and homoge | Feb 26, 2018 |

B Proper time of photon in Friedman metric | Feb 26, 2018 |

I Black holes with connected interiors? | Dec 16, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**