I need to prove the following:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

let p be a metric on X, and f:[0,infinity)->[0,infinity) s.t:

1.f(0)=0.

2.f is monotonically increasing.

3. f satisfy: f((a+b)/2)>=(f(a)+f(b))/2

prove that: f(p(x,y)) is a metric on X, and that that f(p(x,y)) and p(x,y) are equivalent, i.e that there exists reals: b>a>0 s.t a<=f(p(x,y))/p(x,y)<=b.

now to prove the first two consitions for metric is quite easy and i did it, but i find it a bit difficult to prove the triangle inequality, i have a feeling that 3's sign should <=, this way we do get the triangle inequality, am i right?

and concerning equivalence of metrics, basically if it's f((a+b)/2)<=(f(a)+f(b))/2, then

f(p(x,y))/p(x,y)<=2f(p(x,y)/2)/p(x,y)<=....<=2^nf(p(x,y)/2^n)/p(x,y), so for p(x,y) we get the maximum of the ratios, so i think that basically f(p(x,y))/p(x,y)<=f(1), don't know about the left inequality.

any hints?

as always your help is appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Metrics math problem help

Loading...

Similar Threads - Metrics math problem | Date |
---|---|

I Lie derivative of a metric determinant | Dec 22, 2017 |

I Conformal Related metrics | Nov 12, 2017 |

A On the dependence of the curvature tensor on the metric | Nov 2, 2017 |

A Simple metric tensor question | Aug 14, 2017 |

Please Help me Translate French Math Terms | Nov 13, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**