MI String

  • Thread starter croxbearer
  • Start date
  • #1
croxbearer
18
0
I don't know if you have encountered this problem in Logic and Mathematics. Anyway, you may try this:

You are given with an initial string of MI.

Here are the rules:

i) If you have a string that ends with I you can add a U
ii) If you have an Mx, (i.e., an a string that starts with an M, with other characters succeeding it) you can double the characters succeeding the M, i.e., you may lengthen your string by writing Mxx
ii) If you have an III part on your string, you may replace it with a U
iv) If you have a UU in your string, you can drop this altogether, i.e., starting with an MUUU, you can drop the UU, to get MU.

Now, the question is: Could you produce a string containing the characters, MU? (without of course trespassing the bounds of the rules)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Rogerio
403
1
YES!
initial string "MI"
(rule 2) -> "MII"
(rule 2) -> "MIIII"
(rule 3) -> "MUI" : this string contains the characters MU !

But it's impossible to get the string "MU" as final result.
 
  • #3
croxbearer
18
0
I am sorry. May I rephrase the question with:

Could you produce a string containing exactly the characters, MU?
 
  • #4
NateTG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,452
7
croxbearer said:
I am sorry. May I rephrase the question with:

Could you produce a string containing exactly the characters, MU?


Obviously not, since you can never get a string that does not contain at least one I.

Proof:
Consdier how the various operations alter the number of I's mod 3:
1,3, and 4 do not change it at all, and 2 multiplies the total number of I's by two.
Thus you cannot get from a string that has a number of I's that is not zero mod 3 to one that is. Specificall you cannot get from a string that contains one I to one that contains zero.
 
  • #5
Xargoth
11
0
You can double the x where [tex]M_x[/tex]

3I is equal to U

[tex]\frac{2^n}{3}[/tex]

You are doomed to end up with 1 "I" remaining..
 
  • #6
gnpatterson
69
0
It is possible to get MIIIII (5 I's) so why shouldn't it be possible to get more numbers?

mi->mii->miiii->miiiiiiii->miiiiiiiu->miiiiiuu->miiiii
 
Last edited:
  • #7
gnpatterson
69
0
OK I think i see it now, It seems to be impossible to get to 3 from 1 by doubling, i can get any number mod 3 = 1 or 2.
 
  • #8
Xargoth
11
0
Oh i was trying to say minimum # of I can only be 1, i didn't mean to rule out "2"
 

Suggested for: MI String

Replies
2
Views
438
Replies
2
Views
368
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
302
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
203
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
336
Replies
50
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
298
Replies
86
Views
2K
Top