I Missing energy for new physics

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Physics
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I understand that missing energy is a sign for new physics (BSM, supersymmetry). However, almost all the time, the missing energy is associated with neutrinos. How can someone decide if some missing energy comes from somewhere else, other than neutrinos? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Estimate how many events you expect from neutrinos, then see if you find more than that. Binning the analysis in missing transverse momentum or similar observables helps to distinguish between neutrinos and BSM particles, as they will generally lead to different distributions.
 
Silviu said:
Hello!
Hi

Silviu said:
I understand that missing energy is a sign for new physics (BSM, supersymmetry). However, almost all the time, the missing energy is associated with neutrinos
Well, not exactly... there is missing energy due to:
1) Standard Model processes (real missing ET)
2) Mismeasurement of the energy of the particles in each event (or even losing some objects).
The large missing energy is more likely to come from neutrinos, rather than a mismeasurement of your hard particles.

Silviu said:
How can someone decide if some missing energy comes from somewhere else, other than neutrinos?
Well this is kinda vague... one example that comes to my mind out of the blue:
Are there standard model processes that don't produce missing energy due to neutrinos? If yes (and it's a yes, for example Zmumu or Zee), then you can try and pick up those processes, and test how much missing et you actually measure... since there is no "neutrinos" in these processes, then you know that the missing et is actually coming from your mismeasurement...
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top