SR Misunderstanding: Mass from E=mc^2?

  • Thread starter Silverious
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sr
In summary: The material will start to behave differently, and the energy involved will be difficult to calculate.In summary, when you compress a spring, you add energy to it. This energy has mass, which comes from whatever is compressing the spring. Energy and mass are interchangeable, and this is an example of an instance where they are.
  • #1
Silverious
52
0
I was reading in my textbook today. And it said that if you compress a spring, the mass increases due to E=mc^2. Technically that sounds right, but where does the mass come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As you compress the spring, you add energy to it. This energy has mass. It comes from whatever is compressing the spring.
 
  • #3
Energy and mass are interchangeable. Take like example a photon, it has not mass. But if a photon hits an object and it's absorbed by it, the object will gain mass (the energy of the photon will transform to mass)
 
  • #4
...but any such increase will be so minute that it will be immeasurable.

Also, I am not sure that this view is generally accepted any more. Someone on the board posted something to the effect that "relativistic mass" is a passé concept, replaced by a more general notion of "relativistic energy".

Would anyone else care to comment?
 
  • #5
There is an approach to relativistic kinematics that, first of all, claims c as a limiting velocity, and then goes on to explain this kinematical feature as a consequence of increasing relativistic mass (clearly dynamical). Whether this is passe or not, it seems trite to me.

When one considers the issue of gravitation, it is clear that the compressed spring will induce a greater curvature than the same spring in a relaxed state. In fact, it is this idea that partly results in a black hole. Even if there is a continuous distribution of matter, above some critical mass, the matter cannot support itself. At this critical point, any back pressure actually increases the stress energy, thus inducing a spacetime curvature that overcomes the resistance to compress.
 
  • #6
Silverious said:
I was reading in my textbook today. And it said that if you compress a spring, the mass increases due to E=mc^2. Technically that sounds right, but where does the mass come from?

Potential energy is an abstract concept one uses when one does not which to account for where the energy actually is, but one may say it is in the increased potential. More precicely accounting for it, when you compress the spring you are changing the electric field line configuration between atoms and molecules. You are changing the energy stored in the electric field or from a quantum perspective increasing the energy associated with the virtual photons mediating the electric force. This is where the center of momentum frame energy called mass is.
 
  • #7
Okay, I think I understand. But I have another question, I'm not sure if it applies but: What happens when I stretch the spring past the elastic limit. Does the "mass" increase in some other way relative to how I elongate it?
 
  • #8
If it's reversible, you can still treat it the same way; you just have to realize that, to do a calculation, it isn't linear. If you extend it into the plastic region, as far as I know, all bets are off.
 

1. What is the equation E=mc^2 and how does it relate to mass?

The equation E=mc^2, also known as the mass-energy equivalence formula, is one of the most famous equations in physics. It relates mass (m) and energy (E) and states that the energy of an object (E) is equal to its mass (m) multiplied by the speed of light squared (c^2).

2. How does the equation E=mc^2 support the concept of mass being a form of energy?

E=mc^2 supports the concept of mass being a form of energy because it shows that mass and energy are interchangeable. This means that a small amount of mass can produce a large amount of energy, as demonstrated by nuclear reactions.

3. Can you explain why some people misunderstand the concept of mass from E=mc^2?

Some people misunderstand the concept of mass from E=mc^2 because they may think that the equation suggests that mass can be created from energy. However, the equation only shows the relationship between mass and energy and does not imply that mass can be created or destroyed.

4. How does the equation E=mc^2 relate to Einstein's theory of relativity?

E=mc^2 is a fundamental part of Einstein's theory of relativity. It was derived by Einstein as a consequence of his theory, which states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion. The equation shows that mass and energy are two forms of the same thing and can be converted into each other.

5. How has the equation E=mc^2 impacted our understanding of the universe?

The equation E=mc^2 has had a significant impact on our understanding of the universe. It has helped us understand the relationship between mass and energy, and has been crucial in the development of nuclear energy and weapons. It has also led to advancements in our understanding of the origins and structure of the universe, as well as the study of black holes and other celestial objects.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
760
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
871
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top