Modding My Road Bike for Aerodynamics: Ideas & Suggestions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around modifying a road bike for improved aerodynamics, exploring various ideas and suggestions for enhancements. Participants share their thoughts on the practicality of such modifications, potential design approaches, and software tools for modeling aerodynamic changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests adding a fiberglass shell to channel air around the legs and lower bike frame, with potential future modifications for shoulder airflow.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of aerodynamic modifications for non-professional cyclists, implying that such enhancements may only benefit elite athletes.
  • A participant shares a link to a resource about the world's fastest bicycle, indicating interest in aerodynamic performance.
  • There is a request for recommendations on software for modeling aerodynamic changes, specifically asking about CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) tools.
  • One participant mentions using Fluent for CFD, noting its complexity but power, and suggests SolidWorks Cosmos as a more user-friendly alternative.
  • Discussion includes considerations about the accuracy, cost, and learning curve associated with different CFD software options.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and necessity of aerodynamic modifications for road bikes, with some supporting the idea and others questioning its relevance for non-professional cyclists. The discussion on software tools remains open-ended, with no consensus on the best option for beginners.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying levels of experience with CFD software, indicating a range of familiarity and expertise that may affect their recommendations. The discussion does not resolve the effectiveness of modifications or the best modeling tools.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in cycling aerodynamics, bike modifications, and those seeking software tools for modeling aerodynamic performance may find this discussion relevant.

Shawnzyoo
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I have been toying with the idea of modding my road bike (pedal) for increased aerodynamicy;
for starters of adding a small fiberglass shell on the front to channel the air around my legs and lower bike frame
possibly eventually adding a shell to control the flow around my shoulders more
does anyone have any ideas/suggestions/comments
i am interested to hear anything
thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Shawnzyoo said:
I have been toying with the idea of modding my road bike (pedal) for increased aerodynamicy;
for starters of adding a small fiberglass shell on the front to channel the air around my legs and lower bike frame
possibly eventually adding a shell to control the flow around my shoulders more
does anyone have any ideas/suggestions/comments
i am interested to hear anything
thanks

I have a road bicycle too. But I think you are not going to take advantage of any modding about increasing aerodynamics. Maybe Lance Armstrong or Jan Ulrich who rides at 60 km/h counter-cronometer will take advantage of it. But if you are not a professional cyclist (like me) don't think too much about it.
 
i meant CFD sorry about that
i honestly have never used one before
is there one that is easier to learn for beginners?
thanks
 
I use Fluent( http://www.fluent.com/ ) though it is by no means easy---very powerful though. I've played with solidworks Cosmos ( http://www.solidworks.com/pages/products/cosmos/cosmosfloworks.html ) it's fairly easy to use and is integrated rather nicely into solidworks.

There are some F/OSS CFD packages out there too. What you decide to use will be determined by how accurate you need you flow model to be, how much you want ot spend, and how much time you want to invest in learning how to use said software.

Just as a frame of reference, I work in engine controls so the extent of flow modeling I do is to put my sensors( airflow meters mostly for new designs or thermocouples in exhaust systems) into the intakes and exhaust headers in locations that give the Data Acq units representative samples with as little flow disruption as possible. CFD helps me do this but most of the flow analysis is done by different groups.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 129 ·
5
Replies
129
Views
82K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
9K