Model of Universe Allowing Creation of Particles

  • Thread starter john shoemaker
  • Start date
  • #1
john shoemaker

Main Question or Discussion Point

Einstein repeatedly noted that the his theory didn't preclude
>>negative mass-energy. He wrote that he wouldn't elaborate on it in
>>a physical theory since it had not been physically observed. His
>>predilection for a net density of 0 can be seen in his writing as
>>is his almost plaintive admission that "this does not appear so."
>>He never wavered in his disallowing of physical singularities and
>>could he have known of their popularity soon after his death he
>>likely would be especially receptive to a possibility that would
>>preclude them and provide tests for which data might (and did) soon
>>appear.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Model of Universe Allowing Probability of Creation of Particles
>>
>>This model holds that all existing particles have non-zero
>>probabilities for creation and annihilation (Pc, Pa) and these same
>>probabilities exist for particles of like observable descriptors
>>except that the mass is negative and equal in quantity---- |m-| =
>>|m+|. (Pc=particles/time-cubic three space, Pa = particles/time.
>>Probabilities operate in proper space-time).
>>
>>In laboratory of m+ matter observation of E/M interactions between
>>m- and m+ matter inhibited by lack of m- matter. This lack of
>>perception within the laboratory produces difficulty in conceiving
>>of possible E/M interactions between m+ instruments in the
>>laboratory and m-matter at large distance. m- collections thus
>>appear transparent, unusually devoid of m+ matter.
>>
>>The probability for creation of neutrons apparently being
>>considerable, this is the only probability considered here.
>>Particles of one type of mass will tend to collect gravitationally
>>and repel oppositely massed particles. M(sum of m+ minus sum of m-
>>within a radius r) divided by |M|( sum of m- plus sum of m+) tends
>>monotonically to zero as r increases about any point. Likely GR
>>will agree that E/M and other physics of m- matter are similar to
>>that for m+ matter.
>>
>>A collapsing m+ neutron star will speed clocks of m- matter . These
>>"clocks" acting thru Pc preclude developed black hole: the formulas
>>below relate to neutrons entering a sphere of radius R(inside
>>neutron star) at velocity dr/dt.
>>
>>Density at its surface is D(finite number).
>>
>>dm/dt, R, D are observed, measured far from star.
>>
>>dm+/dt = 4 xPi x Rsquare x D(R) x dr/dt < 4 x Pi x Rsquare x D x C
>>(light speed=1)
>>
>>dm-/dt > Pc x 4/3 x Pi x R^3 (1+ M/2R)^3 over 1-2M/R.
>>
>>M = D x volume of sphere of radius R. Note that when integrating
>>IntD/r over this sphere to get metric-- ruler-clock expansion
>>factor, the largest r between any mass element and any 3space
>>element for which we desire the factor is 2R. Thus actual expansion
>>factor greater. Note we are ignoring mass outside the sphere.
>>
>>If R is such that M(R)/2R is close enough to 1 that dm-/dt > dm+/dt
>>(note that expansion of rulers goes to 2) that is:
>>
>>Pc x 4/3 x Pi x 2^3 R^3 over 1-M/2R > 4 x Pi x R^2 x D
>>
>>or Pc x 8/3 R over 1-M/2R > D --- then
>>
>>net mass within radius R does not increase. The alternative to the
>>above "If" is that there is no R such that M / 2R approaches one.
>>m- neutrons appearing within high enough density of m+ neutrons
>>will annihilate with m+ neutrons(QM extrapolation)
>>
>>Very large collections of m+ matter containing much hydrogen will
>>present high energy--low particle density which decreases
>>probability of annihilation of m+-m- matter and escape of m-
>>matter. Local region of order 10^10 Ly possibly artifact of prior
>>collapse of region of this order and subsequent fusion-excursion
>>expansion.
>>
>>A large region of relatively constant density m- matter containing
>>a smaller void(perhaps due to presence of m+ matter there) can be
>>handled in the elementary physics classroom by imagining the region
>>to have no void but have imbedded in the m- dominated region a
>>small region of m+ matter of absolute density equal to the
>>"average" density of the voided region of m- matter. A void induced
>>by an m+ galaxy in a large m- region could be approximated as a
>>sphere of m+ matter of radius of order of the galaxy. As the
>>gravitational(centripetal) effect of this incompressible imaginary
>>matter would proceed from 0 at r=0 to maximum at the surface, far
>>observation would show that the outer reaches of the galaxy suffer
>>a higher central attraction(and velocity) than more central matter.
>>This effect is superimposed on the effect of the visible(m+) matter
>>
>>A compact enough galaxy cluster could induce above Elem. Phy. void
>>of cluster size thus effecting the dynamics of peripheral galaxies
>>within the cluster more than central ones in their co-orbiting.
>>Individual galaxies would not exhibit the appearance of higher
>>central attraction for peripheral matter. Individual galaxies in
>>less compact clusters would exhibit combination of above dynamics.
>>
>>Thank you for your consideration,
>>
>>John Shoemaker
>
>>
 

Answers and Replies

Related Threads on Model of Universe Allowing Creation of Particles

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
Top