measure spaces and random variable are still fuzzy to me although i'm starting to see how random variable are s(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

used, i need some clarification on the following

suppose we have a random variable [tex] X [/tex] we don't know what the exact sample space is but say we know the density is [tex] f_{X}(x) , x \in [a,b] [/tex]

now can we re-model the probability space as

[tex] \Omega = [a,b] [/tex]

sigma field [tex] \mathcal{F} = \mathcal{B}([a,b]) [/tex] and probability measure [tex] P(M) = \int_{M}f_{X}(x) dm [/tex]

Can i assume that the borel set generated by [a,b] is a valid sigma field, since [tex] X [/tex] has a density defined on [a,b], so the measure must be defined on all [tex] \mathcal{B}([a,b]) [/tex] as well (not sure how to prove this formally, if this is correct)

suppose now if we had a Random variable [tex] Y = 2X [/tex]

then we could say the distribution of Y [tex] P_{Y}(B) = P(\{ Y \in B \}) = \int_{K}f_{X}(x) dm [/tex] where [tex] K = \{ k : 2k \in B \} [/tex].

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Modelling probability spaces

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**