Let [tex]A, M[/tex] be a commutative ring and a finitely generated A-module respectively. Let [tex]\phi[/tex] be an A-module endomorphism of M such that [tex]\phi (M)\subseteq \alpha\ M[/tex] where [tex]\alpha[/tex] is an ideal of A. Let [tex]x_1,\dots,x_n[/tex] be the generators of M. Then we know that [tex]\displaystyle{\phi(x_i)=\sum_{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}x_j\ (1\leq i\leq n;\ a_{ij}\in \alpha)}[/tex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Then the book I have (commutative algebra by atiyah goes on to say) - That means

[tex] \sum_{j=1}^{n} (\delta_{ij}\phi - a_{ij})x_j=0,\ \delta_{ij}[/tex] being the kronecker delta function This is the part I can't understand - how can you separate [tex]\phi[/tex] form it's argument [tex]x_j[/tex]. How can [tex] \phi(x) = \phi\cdot x[/tex]?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Module question

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**