1. PF Insights is off to a great start! Fresh and interesting articles on all things science and math. Here: PF Insights

Molecular geometry

  1. Hey! How can we compute the molecular geometry for molecules and further use the VSEPR since electrons are continouly in motion, of which i actualy expected to hav temporary geometries ie. Oscilatin once an not a fixed or rigid which shows as if the system is static!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. chemisttree

    chemisttree 3,723
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Fluxional compounds do just as you say. They are in a constant state of change. Most amines are examples of this. More stable compounds are in constant motion as well(above absolute zero) but the motion is motion about a certain geometry. The average structure is the one usually shown since it is difficult to draw a vibrating thingy every time you discuss something.
     
  4. Thanks i now get it! But what do you actually mean by fluxional compounds. gec am interested

    also do u min that the geometries we actualy predict cary large probability of occurence? Oh what did you actualy mean that it oscilate round the predicted geometry!
     
  5. chemisttree

    chemisttree 3,723
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The latter for most compounds. By fluxional I mean that some compounds interconvert between different 'shapes'. Examples of these are the organometallic compounds such as bis(cyclopentadienyl)mercury (II) that exists both as the bis-monohapto and bis-pentahapto complexes. In the bis-monohapto complex the mercury is sigma bonded once to two carbon atoms... one on each of the two cyclopentadiene groups. In the bis-pentahapto complex, the mercury is bonded to every carbon in both cyclopentadienyl groups. That's about as fluxional as you can get.
     
  6. DrDu

    DrDu 4,210
    Science Advisor

    You are right, molecules don't have a shape on a fundamental level. The shape arises as a new concept upon application of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.
    Basically, we are replacing the molecular system of interest by a model system of particles with defined shape which is easier to describe. The error e.g. in energy from this approximation is small on a chemical scale but may be too large on a spectroscopic scale.
     
  7. Hey what does the born approximations say on the molecular expresions
     
  8. DrDu

    DrDu 4,210
    Science Advisor

    Just google for "Born Oppenheimer" you should find tons of references. A fascinating but high brow book on the topic is "Chemistry, quantum mechanics, and reductionism : perspectives in theoretical chemistry / Hans Primas".
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?