Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Molecular Vibration of Solids

  1. Dec 5, 2017 #1
    why are molecular vibrations never synchronized in a way that would make them macroscopically observable?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 5, 2017 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Why would you expect them to synchronize?

    MRI has a process to synchronize some fraction of nuclear spins - enough to pick up a signal with a conventional antenna.
     
  4. Dec 5, 2017 #3

    anorlunda

    Staff: Mentor

    Isn't this the same question as "Why don't all the waves in the ocean synchronize to make one big wave?"

    As @mfb said, "Why would you expect them to synchronize?"
     
  5. Dec 5, 2017 #4

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The earliest practical examples of Stimulated Emission was with Microwaves. The MASER came before the LASER and in both cases, waves are produced in synchronism. You do need 'special' conditions for this to happen and it would never happen by chance because of the way the energy levels are naturally populated. It would be interesting to know the lowest frequency of stimulated emission that has been achieved. Probably something to do with thermal activity upsetting the population?
    I did a search and found this PF link which suggests there is no actual lower limit. It's not done because it's much easier to produce a non-quantum based process (a common or garden electronic oscillator) for producing coherent RF waves.
     
  6. Dec 5, 2017 #5

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    That's not true. E. g., sound waves in solids are synchronised vibrations of the molecules. The term to look for is "collective excitations".
     
  7. Dec 5, 2017 #6

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    What makes you think that they are not "synchronized"?

    There are "normal modes" of vibrations in solids. And DrDu has pointed out another example.

    Your starting premise is faulty. Rather than asking us to explain your faulty starting premise, it is wise to FIRST establish if that premise is true or false.

    Zz.
     
  8. Dec 5, 2017 #7
    If we had two magnets swinging on pendulums, I would expect them to synchronize after a while(Right?).

    you are right. I was thinking about the vibrations that are due too temperature.
     
  9. Dec 5, 2017 #8
    How so?
     
  10. Dec 5, 2017 #9

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's a while since I learned about stimulated emission but is it not true to say that a population inversion (necessary for lasing) is not a common natural occurrence?
     
  11. Dec 5, 2017 #10

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Based on friction macroscopic objects have. There is no friction on the level of individual atoms because you can't heat their constituents.
     
  12. Dec 5, 2017 #11
    Assuming that there was no friction, wouldn't two magnets swinging freely parallel to each other eventually synchronize?
     
  13. Dec 5, 2017 #12

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    No.
     
  14. Dec 6, 2017 at 6:45 AM #13
    Search Youtube for "Metronome Synchronization" , keep in mind they share a "floating" platform...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Molecular Vibration of Solids
  1. Molecular dynamics (Replies: 2)

  2. Molecular geometry (Replies: 4)

Loading...