Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Moller scattering polarized cross section
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="kontejnjer, post: 5546071, member: 211722"] [h2]Homework Statement[/h2] [/B] (Note: this is not strictly homework, but it is related to one course I'm doing, and I can't find a useful solution anywhere) Find the analytical expression for the scattering cross section of two longitudinally polarized electrons at tree level. [h2]Homework Equations[/h2] [/B] [itex]\displaystyle d\sigma=\left|\mathcal{M}_{fi}\right|^2\frac{d\Phi}{4I}[/itex] Feynman rules [h2]The Attempt at a Solution[/h2] [/B] There's two diagrams at tree level since the particles are identical: the [itex]t[/itex] channel and the [itex]u[/itex] channel. There is a relative minus sign between the channels due to the fact the particles are identical fermions. The total scattering amplitude is: [itex]\displaystyle i\mathcal{M}_{fi}=i\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t+i\mathcal{M}_{fi}^u=\frac{e^2}{t}\bar u^{s'}(p_4)\gamma^\mu u^s (p_2) \bar u^{r'} (p_3)\gamma_\mu u^r (p_1)-\frac{e^2}{u}\bar u^{r'}(p_3)\gamma^\mu u^s (p_2) \bar u^{s'} (p_4)\gamma_\mu u^r(p_1) [/itex] Here [itex]t=(p_3-p_1)^2[/itex], [itex]u=(p_4-p_1)^2[/itex] are the Mandelstam variables, [itex]p_1[/itex] and [itex]p_2[/itex] are inital momenta with spins [itex]r[/itex] and [itex]s[/itex] respectively, and final momenta [itex]p_3[/itex] and [itex]p_4[/itex] with spins [itex]r'[/itex] and [itex]s'[/itex] respectively. As the initial electrons are longitudinally polarized, we know their spin states, however we still need to sum over the final spins, so the square of the amplitude is: [itex] \left|\mathcal{M}_{fi}\right|^2=\sum\limits_{s',r'} \left(|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t|^2+|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^u|^2-2(\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t)^* \mathcal{M}_{fi}^u\right)[/itex] After some manipulation, and using the identity [itex]\sum\limits_{s}u^s(p)\bar u^s(p)=\gamma\cdot p+m[/itex], we can write down the square of each component as: [itex] \sum\limits_{s',r'}|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t|^2=\frac{e^4}{t^2}{Tr}\left[\gamma^\mu u^s(p_2) \bar u^s(p_2)\gamma^\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_4+m)\right]\cdot {Tr}\left[\gamma_\mu u^r(p_1)\bar u^r (p_1) \gamma_\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_3+m)\right]\\ \sum\limits_{s',r'}|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^u|^2=\frac{e^4}{u^2}{Tr}\left[\gamma^\mu u^s(p_2) \bar u^s(p_2)\gamma^\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_3+m)\right]\cdot {Tr}\left[\gamma_\mu u^r(p_1)\bar u^r (p_1) \gamma_\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_4+m)\right]\\ \sum\limits_{s',r'}(\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t)^* \mathcal{M}_{fi}^u=\frac{e^4}{ut}{Tr} \left[\gamma^\mu u^s(p_2) \bar u^s(p_2)\gamma^\nu(\gamma\cdot{p}_3+m) \gamma_\mu u^r(p_1)\bar u^r (p_1) \gamma_\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_4+m)\right][/itex] This is the part that I get stuck on: the initial spins are predefined so I can't just sum over them, and the previously mentioned identity doesn't work in this case, all I know is that the initial spins should be helicity eigenstates. There's a reference paper for this exact topic by Adam M. Bincer - [I]Scattering of longitudinally polarized fermions [/I](DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.107.1434), but the notation is somewhat outdated and I think it omits some crucial steps. I know I could just pick a representation and a frame and do the whole trace calculation using some symbolic software, but the end result doesn't give me much qualitative info, what I'd like is to just have a frame-independent square of the scattering amplitude in terms of 4-momenta, so I can just pick any frame (say, COM or lab) and get the analytic result. Any advice or hints would be greatly appreciated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Moller scattering polarized cross section
Back
Top