# Moment of Inertia/ Kinetic Energy

1. Mar 25, 2008

### klopez

An ice skater starts a spin with her arms stretched out to the sides. She balances on the tip of one skate to turn without friction. She then pulls her arms in so that her moment of inertia decreases by a factor of two. In the process of her doing so, what happens to her kinetic energy?
-It undergoes a change by an amount that obviously depends on how fast the skater pulls her arms in.
-It decreases by a factor of two.
-It is zero because her center of mass is stationary.
-It increases by a factor of four.
-It decreases by a factor of four.
-It remains constant.
-It increases by a factor of two.

I know that Ki = (1/2)Iω2 , so isn't her Kf = (1/2)(I/2)(2ω2) = (1/2)Iω2 = Ki ???
Doesn't the angular speed increase by a factor of two as well?
My guess would be "It remains constant" (And I can only choose one)

Can anyone give me advice on this problem? Thank you

Kevin

2. Mar 25, 2008

### Staff: Mentor

The KE $= (1/2) I \omega^2$. You know how I changes, but how does $\omega$ change?

Hint: What's conserved?

3. Mar 25, 2008

### klopez

Tell me if this makes sense....

Conservation of angular momentum Li = Lf

wi = omega_i
wf = omega_f

Li = I*wi
Lf = I/2 * wf

2wi = wf

Now in terms of kinetic energy

Ki = (1/2)I*wi^2

Kf = (1/2)*(I/2)*wf^2 (I plug in my wf from above)
Kf = (I/4)(4wi^2)
Kf = I*wi^2

When I compare both Ki and Kf now, Kf is twice as large as Ki because it does not have a (1/2) in its equation like Ki does.

Is this correct?

4. Mar 25, 2008

### Staff: Mentor

Perfect!

5. Mar 25, 2008

### Gear300

You seem to have got it right...but before you continue on...remember the conservation of energy principle. If Kf is twice as large as Ki, where did that additional energy come from??

Last edited: Mar 25, 2008