So this question has been asked elsewhere, yet I haven't found a clear explanation.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Definition. momentum := mass * velocity, or

p=m*v

Now if we know p, then we know the direction v points in, and we get a function from R to R, which maps the magnitude of v to the mass, inverse proportionally. This seems like the only way of interpreting momentum, given the definition above.

In order for momentum to be a covector, two independent vectors would need to evaluate to the same real value, provided they're both in the same level set (codimension 1 plane). What does this say about momentum? Can a bullet headed North have the same momentum as a bullet heading East?

Rather, i suppose the answer is, given a bullet headed north, we can ask "what is the momentum in the direction NE?"

Ah, now it makes sense to use a dot product, then to clean things up by considering momentum a covector. The above definition is misleading, then, we should say momentum of q _in_the_direction_v_ is defined as <mq',v>, whereby <mq'|.> is the momentum covector.

Great!

Andrew Marshall

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Momentum is a covector?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**