More fundamental and more difficult

In summary, the conversation discusses the differences between professional engineering work and theoretical research in terms of their applicability and difficulty in solving real-life problems. While professional engineering is more directly applied to the real world, theoretical research is crucial in making discoveries and ultimately impacting the real world. The two domains also differ in terms of difficulty, with theoretical research being more challenging due to factors such as funding, academic politics, and competition for positions.
  • #1
redgoat
37
0
Which one is more fundamental or more difficult in solving real-life problems, professional engineering work or theoretical research?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Fundamental in solving real life problems? Do you mean, which domain is more applicable to the "real world"? I view it like this, professional engineering certainly applies to the world more often than theoretical research. But it's theoretical research that causes any discoveries to be made all and therefore impacts the real world the most.

Now there's a big difference between the words fundamental and diffucult. I would think that theoretical research would be more diffucult. You have to maintain funding, play academic politics, naviagate post doc positions when they're 2,000 professor positions to like 20,000 post docs. In engineering, you get a job, get paid big bucks, and directly help people out.
 
  • #3


Both professional engineering work and theoretical research are equally fundamental and difficult in solving real-life problems.

Professional engineering work involves applying scientific and mathematical principles to design, develop, and maintain various technological systems and products. This requires a deep understanding of the fundamental principles and their practical applications. Engineers must also consider various constraints, such as cost, safety, and environmental impact, while finding solutions to real-life problems. This can be a challenging task, requiring a combination of technical knowledge, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills.

On the other hand, theoretical research involves the study and analysis of fundamental principles to develop new theories and concepts. This requires a high level of intellectual rigor, creativity, and innovation. Theoretical research is essential in advancing our understanding of the world and finding new solutions to complex problems. However, it can be a long and arduous process, with no guarantee of practical applications or success.

In conclusion, both professional engineering work and theoretical research are fundamental and difficult in their own ways. While engineering work focuses on practical applications, theoretical research lays the foundation for future advancements. Both are crucial in solving real-life problems and contribute to the overall progress of society.
 

Related to More fundamental and more difficult

1. What does it mean for something to be more fundamental?

Something that is more fundamental is considered to be at a deeper or more basic level of understanding. It is often the underlying principle or concept that explains larger or more complex ideas.

2. How do you determine if something is more difficult?

The difficulty of something can be subjective and can vary depending on the individual. However, some factors that are commonly considered when determining difficulty include the level of complexity, amount of prior knowledge or skills required, and the time and effort needed to master the concept or task.

3. Can something be both more fundamental and more difficult?

Yes, something can be both more fundamental and more difficult. This is often the case with scientific concepts or theories that are complex and require a deep understanding of fundamental principles in order to fully comprehend.

4. How can understanding more fundamental concepts help in solving more difficult problems?

Having a strong understanding of more fundamental concepts can provide a solid foundation for problem-solving. It allows for a deeper understanding of the underlying principles and can help identify potential solutions or approaches to more difficult problems.

5. Are there any strategies for tackling more fundamental and more difficult concepts?

Some strategies for tackling more fundamental and more difficult concepts include breaking down the concept into smaller parts, seeking out additional resources or explanations, and practicing problem-solving with similar, but less challenging, concepts first. It can also be helpful to collaborate with others or seek guidance from experts in the field.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top