I am trying to figure out a way to prove this without using much set theory (i know that the rationals are countable and the reals are not). is there a way to show that there are more reals than rationals in a more straightforward proof?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# More reals than rationals

Loading...

Similar Threads - More reals rationals | Date |
---|---|

Which mathematical objects are more common in nature? | Dec 4, 2017 |

Math problem, but I think it is more appropriate here | Dec 16, 2016 |

I Rearranging equation with more than variable instance | Aug 18, 2016 |

Math can't be all memorizing! How do you get to the real, more creative side of math? | Mar 11, 2009 |

Proof needed: a cubic equation has odd number of real roots if it has more than one | Apr 22, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**