Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Most boring areas of Physics

  1. Nov 2, 2016 #1
    Hey guys

    So I'm sure there are plenty of threads about what people think are the most exciting subfields, but what about the most boring? Which subfield of physics did you enjoy the least learning?

    I'll begin. In my opinion it has to clearly be scattering theory & everything related (e.g. x-ray diffraction, electron diffraction etc.)- it's just so dry and tiresome. I get depressed just thinking about calculating another cross section.
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 2, 2016 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Physical aspects of paint drying?
  4. Nov 2, 2016 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Actually, I found that quite interesting.

  5. Nov 2, 2016 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Thank you, that was really nice to watch. Maybe you could consider posting it in one of the video galleries elsewhere on this site?
  6. Nov 2, 2016 #5


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I wouldn't know where to post it. So, be my guest.

    And I'm embarrassed again, to say that I'm addicted to these "Sixty Symbols" videos.
    It all started, when Greg posted a thread about Sean Carroll, and Sean went on and on, about something, and kept using the term "entropy", and I decided that I didn't really know what "entropy" was, so I watched about 5 instructional videos on the topic, and then ended up at the Sixty Symbols site. There, a "Mr. Moriarity" said that it was the umteenth time he'd tried to explain it. After watching their umteen videos on "entropy", it started to sink in.
  7. Nov 2, 2016 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    In case that you feel like, you can post it here: https://www.physicsforums.com/media/ and then click the "add media" button.
  8. Nov 4, 2016 #7

    Larry Gopnik

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    That's a shame that you feel that way. I thought scattering was mudane, then I had to develop techniques for analysing diffraction data from Synthrotrons - then I realised how truly interesting the field is.

    Anyway - I've always found that if I found some aspect of my course uninteresting then it'd be because I hadn't been taught it either well enough or because the learning didn't go into enough depth.
  9. Nov 6, 2016 #8
    Unsuitable language warning:

  10. Nov 7, 2016 #9
    I can't comment on which specific area of physics is most boring. But I will say that any purely algebra based physics course is quite boring.
  11. Nov 7, 2016 #10
    Calculating Clebsch-Gordan coefficients by hand in my quantum mechanics class was pretty mind numbing.
  12. Nov 20, 2016 #11
    To me the most boring area is the Acoustics. I don't know why I never ever liked it.
  13. Nov 20, 2016 #12


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    To me, nothing is more boring than something that is pointless. And this thread wins that easily.

  14. Dec 15, 2016 #13
    Yep thats def a contender too.

    Then you must be real pointless to be around.

  15. Dec 15, 2016 #14
    Balls rolling down inclined planes.

    (I only took one semester of physics and decided to stick with math after that).
  16. Dec 15, 2016 #15
    And yes I know that's not an "area."
  17. Dec 15, 2016 #16
    Back when I was an undergraduate, I did not like classical mechanics. I liked quantum mechanics. Later, I had an excellent theoretical physics prof in grad school. (In those days we took two semesters). Today, I favor classical mechanics and statistical mechanics over other areas.

    I do not especially like elasticity and hydrodynamics, though, even though the same prof taught this in the second semester. I could see he was really into it though. He taught the same course from 1947-1980. (Same course in the curriculum, probably not entirely the same material in the same way)

    I think almost any sub-area of physics can be interesting, if presented and approached properly. I think your favorite and disliked areas may change over the course of your career and lifetime.
  18. Dec 31, 2016 #17
    Circuits easily. E&M is fun, but something about circuits just didn't really fit into the whole style of the subject.
  19. Dec 31, 2016 #18


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    Take this one seriously:
    What might be dull to many may be both important and very interesting to someone else. Coatings are important for construction, maintenance, "cosmetics" of diverse kinds, and many functional purposes of paints, coatings, glue, nail polish. Dry-time can be a very important quality of a formula. Developers are using their technical skills and knowledge to study and try to adjust for greater or lesser dry-time. Application end-users need to be able to trust expected dry-time.
  20. Jan 1, 2017 #19
    I think this post is far from pointless. In reading the responses, I have learned that what many practitioner physicists consider dry and boring, others like. I never found calculating Clebsch Gordon coefficients as dull. I also found circuits far more interesting than calculating the magnetic field distribution in a sphere with a particular magnetic potential on the surface.

    When I meet someone who finds out I am a physicist, they usually tell me about the TV program they saw, about time machines, warp drives, quantum consciousness, and some are more down to earth and ask about relativity, quantum effects etc. The fact is many areas of physics that do not pervade the popular culture, for example, the behavior of the gyroscope, contains counter-intuitive mind expanding ideas, that are unadvertised.

    A senior colleague who I worked with my first year of work told me about a young physicist he worked with in the past. After reading a particular chapter in Goldstein, he flipped the book in the air, (presumably around the intermediate axis). The senior colleague (mathematician), asked me years later, what was that about? I told him, but I was unsure whether he saw the significance.
  21. Feb 18, 2017 #20
    IMO that's often the case when circuit analysis is taught through rules and rote, instead of being derived through rigorous physics. I guess it wasn't taught to you as a proper subfield of E&M, but just as some Electrical Engineering stuff?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted