What is the most efficient and powerful way to store energy?

In summary, the conversation discusses the most powerful battery or way to store energy, with some arguing that matter-anti-matter energy storage is the most mass dense, while others mention fusion as a close second. However, it is noted that while anti-matter has the highest storage density, the infrastructure and technology required to produce and store it make it inefficient and difficult to use. Other potential storage methods, such as pumped-water facilities and the Higgs mechanism, are also mentioned. The conversation also delves into the efficiency of converting energy into heat, with some disputing the claim that a heater is 100% efficient at producing heat. Ultimately, it is concluded that matter itself is the most efficient and powerful storage of energy, as it can be
  • #1
FoxCommander
87
1
What is the most powerful battery or way to store energy?

I have an idea but I wanted to see what you guys would say :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Powerful by what definition and what constraints do you put on this? Matter-anti-matter energy storage is probably the most mass dense.
 
  • #3
russ_watters said:
Powerful by what definition and what constraints do you put on this? Matter-anti-matter energy storage is probably the most mass dense.
Correct answer. Fusion would come in a very distant second.
 
  • #4
I agree that anti-matter is the ultimate in storage density. I love the stuff, and would like some to play with. Our current technology, however, makes it just about the most difficult and energy-intensive substance to produce and store.
 
  • #5
Ok good, The other day i was thinking about it and It came to me that anti matter is created when you create matter from energy so i figured it was the most powerful "battery" in the context that it stores energy

Thanks guys I just wanted to make sure :D
 
  • #6
FoxCommander said:
Thanks guys I just wanted to make sure :D

When in doubt, watch Star Trek. :biggrin:
 
  • #7
Fermilab usually has up to 50 (circulating current) milliamps of anti-protons stashed in the 8-GeV cooling ring. Unfortunately, no one has a magic (anti-matter) box to put them in.

There is a pumped-water storage facility in Ludington, Michigan, that stores enough water (pumped uphill from Lake Michigan) to generate about 1800 megawatts for roughly 8 hours.

Bob S
 
  • #8
Danger said:
I agree that anti-matter is the ultimate in storage density. I love the stuff, and would like some to play with. Our current technology, however, makes it just about the most difficult and energy-intensive substance to produce and store.
By that, you mean among the least energy efficient storage/release mechanism, yes. Ie, a battery is better than 90% efficient at storing and giving back its energy.
 
  • #9
I'm not sure if that's what I meant or not, Russ; we appear to be using incompatible terminologies. I'll explain myself more fully.
The anti-matter itself is 100% efficient at converting to energy when combined with matter, so in that sense it has the highest storage density. It's in the required infrastructure that the problem lies. A very rough analogy would be the need to build an entire factory to produce a single AA battery, an elaborate semi-trailer to lug it around, and another factory to collect the energy at the end. As if that weren't bad enough, the first factory puts 1000 volts into the battery and the second one can extract only 1 volt due to collector inefficiencies.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
To be more specific, the potential annihilation of a Planck black hole with its antiparticle.

Otherwise, the symmetry of the Higgs mechanism at the inflationary scale. (This is mostly speculation on my part.)
 
  • #11
Danger said:
I'm not sure if that's what I meant or not, Russ; we appear to be using incompatible terminologies. I'll explain myself more fully.
The anti-matter itself is 100% efficient at converting to energy when combined with matter...
Right. The inefficiency comes in the charging.
...so in that sense it has the highest storage density.
Ehh, well, no. If heat is the goal, there are lots of ways to store energy that output 100% efficiency. A car battery powering a heater is 100% efficient at producing heat, for example.
As if that weren't bad enough, the first factory puts 1000 volts into the battery and the second one can extract only 1 volt due to collector inefficiencies.
That's the part I was describing.
 
  • #12
russ_watters said:
Right. The inefficiency comes in the charging. Ehh, well, no. If heat is the goal, there are lots of ways to store energy that output 100% efficiency.

Ok this is completely false because the amount of energy put into heater is not the same amount of heat energy given off, you are sadly mistaken.

Anyways what is heat? Its energy. And what is pound for pound the most efficient and powerful storage of energy? Well its matter, because when you create an amount of matter the same amount of Anti-matter is created, and when you put the two together you get pure energy.

A heater produces heat. But does all of the energy it uses wether mechanical or electrical go into the heating and therefore 100% efficient? NO And on that note, A heater doesn't store energy. It converts it

Sincerly,
FoxCommander
 

What is a "Most Energy Storage Device"?

A "Most Energy Storage Device" is a technology or system that is designed to store energy for later use. This can include batteries, capacitors, flywheels, and other devices that can store energy in various forms for different purposes.

What are the different types of "Most Energy Storage Devices"?

There are several types of "Most Energy Storage Devices", including batteries, which store energy through chemical reactions; capacitors, which store energy through electric fields; flywheels, which store energy through rotational motion; and pumped hydro storage, which stores energy by pumping water to a higher elevation for later use.

What are the benefits of using "Most Energy Storage Devices"?

Using "Most Energy Storage Devices" can bring a variety of benefits, including helping to balance the supply and demand of energy, reducing the need for fossil fuels, and enabling the integration of renewable energy sources into the grid.

What are the challenges of using "Most Energy Storage Devices"?

Some challenges of using "Most Energy Storage Devices" include high costs, limited availability of certain materials, and the need for efficient and safe storage methods. There may also be technical challenges in integrating these devices into existing energy systems.

How are "Most Energy Storage Devices" being used in real-world applications?

"Most Energy Storage Devices" are being used in a variety of applications, including powering electric vehicles, storing renewable energy from sources like solar and wind, and providing backup power for critical infrastructure. They are also being used in remote areas where traditional power sources are not available.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
726
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
0
Views
538
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
4
Replies
138
Views
31K
Replies
32
Views
666
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
50
  • General Engineering
Replies
27
Views
3K
Back
Top