we have shroedinger's differential equation, heisenberg's matrix mechanics, dirac's formalism, and feynman sum over histories stuff.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

now i may be wrong and and i really don't know anything but i think that these are all equivalent and some even the same thing. but if im going to learn QM for keeps, which is the most useful formalism? i see the point in wasting time learning one and then relearning how to do the same thing a different way. i think i might as well learn the best and just use that. any dissenting opinions on my aforementioned opinion appreciated. thx.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Most useful QM formalism?

Loading...

Similar Threads - useful formalism | Date |
---|---|

I Use the Dirac Equation to calculate transition frequencies in Hydrogen | Mar 6, 2018 |

A What form of the Schrodinger equation do you use for intensity? | Feb 9, 2018 |

I Measurement of a particle's position using photons | Nov 3, 2017 |

B Physicists measure complementary properties using quantum cloning | Aug 16, 2017 |

What Term must be used for this formalism? | Feb 6, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**