Motion and growth

1. Jan 9, 2009

SdogV

So, now I look at a peculiar situation with light photon motion and growth.. Can anyone comment on this thought?

Assume frequency is VERY important.

Then, E=Mc^2 might imply

E- M A'cf where
(a) A' is meters squared per sec, i.e., m^2/t (lower case m is meters!) and
(b) f is frequency, i.e., 1/t
(c) c is light velocity, m/sec

such that c^2 is identical in units to A'cf, i.e. (m^2/sec)(1/sec)(m/sec) =(m^2/sec^2)

So the ubiquity of photon-electron transitions lie in A' and f!
If A'f = c, then c^2 implies A'f =c. But if not, strange things come out of this..

2. Jan 9, 2009

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
How does one "imply" the other? What's the direct derivation from one to the other. It seems as if you simply made it up. And not only that, you're mixing the units with the symbol of the variable. This is very strange.

Zz.

3. Jan 9, 2009

4. Jan 9, 2009

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus