Motion on an inclined plane

  • #1
Deepak K Kapur
164
5
While deriving formulas/describing motion on an inclined plane, why don't we take into account the shape of the object undergoing motion?

e.g.
1. If I take an inclined plane and place a ball on it, only a small amount of inclination would make the ball move down the plane...

But...

2. If a take a matchbox and place it on the inclined plane, a lot of inclination would make it move down...

Why aren't such factors taken into account?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Vatsal Sanjay
48
10
We do take those factors into account. See toppling.
 
  • #3
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,874
1,657
I don't know about you, but "we" always take into account the shape of the object.
When you are being taught how to work out equations of motion, you are taught only the simplest cases - then gradually more complicated cases, until you are good enough to cope with the really hard cases.
 
  • #4
Dale
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
33,454
10,912
Why aren't such factors taken into account?
They are when they matter. Often in introductory classes we use scenarios (like a frictionless inclined plane) where such factors are irrelevant or deliberately idealized. This is not an indication that those factors cannot be taken into account, but just a way to simplify learning and avoid overwhelming students all at once.
 
  • #5
Deepak K Kapur
164
5
Thanks a lot...everyone.
 

Suggested for: Motion on an inclined plane

Replies
12
Views
411
Replies
13
Views
900
Replies
40
Views
943
Replies
41
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
660
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
251
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
383
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
269
Top