Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Multivariable Chain Rule

  1. Sep 14, 2005 #1
    Please let me know if I derived this correctly (I did it a while back, and can't find the notebook):



    At some point I come across this:

    [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}[/tex]

    which I wrote as

    [tex]\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial r^2} \frac{\partial r}{\partial x}[/tex]

    Is it right?
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 14, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Since u depends on r and s, and r and s are both functions of x, you are going to have to take into account the dependence of x on s.

    For any function φ(x,y), [tex]\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial r}}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial s}}\frac{\partial s}{\partial x}}[/tex].

    Now put [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}}[/tex] in place of φ
    You get [tex]\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial r^2}}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}}+ \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial r\partial s}}\frac{\partial s}{\partial x}}[/tex].
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2005
  4. Sep 17, 2005 #3

    I dont think so since du is not equal to dudu
  5. Sep 17, 2005 #4
    If you only need to differentiate once then the following procedure might come in handy. Say for example you have f(x,y,z) where x,y,z are functions of s and t and you needed to the find the partial derivative of f wrts. What you could do is draw a tree diagram.

    You standard with f and the top and draw out three branches, one to each of x, y and z. In a similar manner you do the same with each of x, y and z. That is, draw two branches from each of x, y and z to s and t. You should get a pyramid like diagram after you do this. To find [tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial s}}[/tex] all you would need to do is draw the appropriate path/s. In other words you just go from f along any path where the end point is s. You then 'sum your paths.' The only restriction is that you keep going downward.

    In this case, you would get:

    \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial s}} = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}}\frac{{\partial x}}{{\partial s}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}}\frac{{\partial y}}{{\partial s}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial z}}\frac{{\partial z}}{{\partial s}}

    someone please correct me if my answer is incorrect because I didn't write it down on paper. :biggrin:
  6. Sep 18, 2005 #5
    The chain rule for the first derivative I can handle. It's when you have the second and third derivatives that I can't follow which function is related to what.
  7. Sep 18, 2005 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A second derivative is just the first derivative of what you compute for the first derivative. :tongue2:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Multivariable Chain Rule