Nader snowball's chance in hell of actually winning

  • News
  • Thread starter chroot
  • Start date
In summary: WarrenIt seems that he's come down with dubya's black-and-white syndrome.Huh? Can you elaborate?He believes that because the United States is a democracy, we should always do what the majority wants us to do. He's apparently forgotten what democracy is supposed to be about. It's not about following the majority, it's about following the will of the people. - WarrenHe believes that because the United States is a democracy, we should always do what the majority wants us to do. He's apparently forgotten what democracy is supposed to be about. It's not about following the majority, it's about following the will of the people.
  • #1
chroot
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
10,296
41
What is this guy's problem?

He's widely believed to be the reason Bush even had a chance against Gore, since he steals far more of the democratic vote than the republican vote. I assume that Nader himself would have preferred to see Gore win. I assume Nader realizes that he has a snowball's chance in hell of actually winning.

So what is his problem? Why is he running again? Does he enjoy slanting elections against the candidate he'd presumably prefer to see win?

- Warren
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think he is counting on the press he receives to advertise the green party. Either that or he's a closet Republican!
 
  • #3
:rofl so many excuses! Gore lost because Gore wasn't good enough. Nader isn't too blame. He, Bush, and Gore all went in knowing the rules. Just because Nader is a better alternative than Gore for some doesn't mean they would have voted Gore.
Had the democrats done something besides whine for the last 4 years ,they would be handing Bush his ass, EASILY, right now. Instead, you guys just sit around making excuses for the last time. You have to identify the REAL problem before you can fix it.
 
  • #4
The real problem is that we do not have run-off elections. IMO, elections with 3+ candidates are just too messy.

- Warren
 
  • #5
chroot said:
So what is his problem? Why is he running again? Does he enjoy slanting elections against the candidate he'd presumably prefer to see win?
Aw, c'mon, that's an easy one. I'll give you a hint: it starts with an "e" and ends with a "go".
The real problem is that we do not have run-off elections. IMO, elections with 3+ candidates are just too messy.
I tend to agree, but I think this is a relatively new phenomena. Not a whole lot of 3rd party candidates get enough votes to matter, but then we had Perot and Nader.
 
  • #6
Channel surfing a few weeks back I caught a TV show (I believe it was Bill Maher's new one) with Bill and Michale Moore on their knees in front of Ralph begging for him not to run...they were dead serious.
 
  • #7
I'm considering trying to gather support to demonstrate in front of voting precincts in November, just reminding people that essentially a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush.

- Warren
 
  • #8
Nader is apparently not on the ballot in a number of states.. I'm not sure what that means. How can a candidate still be in the running at all if only some Americans can vote for him?

- Warren
 
  • #9
chroot said:
Nader is apparently not on the ballot in a number of states.. I'm not sure what that means. How can a candidate still be in the running at all if only some Americans can vote for him?

- Warren

third party rules are slanted to keep them out of the national level Each state gets to handle their voting regulations, and many do anything they can to keep third parties off the ballot. It's stupid.
 
  • #10
Nader's response to the "spoiler" criticism:
http://www.kintera.org/AccountTempFiles/Account9873/images/65643_spoiler_kit2.jpg
:smile:
Gotta love him!
 

Attachments

  • nader spoiler.jpg
    nader spoiler.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 465
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
chroot, Nader doesn't appear to be much of a bigger fan of Al Gore than George Bush. In fact, he stated once that we would have invaded Iraq no matter which one was President.
 
  • #12
JohnDubYa said:
chroot, Nader doesn't appear to be much of a bigger fan of Al Gore than George Bush. In fact, he stated once that we would have invaded Iraq no matter which one was President.

It seems that he's come down with dubya's black-and-white syndrome.
 
  • #13
Huh? Can you elaborate?
 

FAQ: Nader snowball's chance in hell of actually winning

1. Is Nader's snowball's chance in hell of winning a real possibility?

No, it is not a realistic possibility. Nader has not been a major political figure for many years and is not a current candidate in any major election.

2. Why is Nader's snowball's chance in hell of winning often brought up in discussions about politics?

Nader's snowball's chance in hell of winning is often brought up as a way to express the extreme unlikelihood of something happening. It is a commonly used phrase to emphasize that something is highly improbable.

3. Has Nader ever won a major political election?

No, Nader has never won a major political election. He has run for president multiple times, but has never been successful in winning the election.

4. What role did Nader play in past presidential elections?

Nader was known for being a third-party candidate in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. His presence on the ballot was controversial as many believed he took votes away from the Democratic candidate, ultimately affecting the outcome of the election.

5. Is Nader still actively involved in politics?

No, Nader is no longer actively involved in politics. He has not run for office since 2008 and has since focused on his advocacy work and writing.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
13K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Back
Top