I'd like to ask some questions about the following example of broken symmetry and non-invariant vaccum.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The basic argument goes as follows:

[tex] \Cal L= \partial^\mu \phi \partial_\mu \phi \: - \: \mu^2 \phi^* \phi \: - \: \lambda (\phi^*\phi)^2

[/tex]

[tex]

\frac{\partial V} {\partial \phi}=0

[/tex]

[tex]

<\phi>^2=\frac{\mu^2}{2\lambda}

[/tex]

My first question regards the following term in the lagrangian:

[tex]\lambda (\phi^*\phi)^2[/tex]

does this term indicate that the field is self-interacting?

What does that mean for a field to self interact?

My next question regards the result.

Now, the expectation value of the field is shown not to be equal to zero when V is minimized. I have read that

"this implies that the vacuum is not invariant under the u(1) symmetry [tex] \phi \rightarrow e^{i\theta}\phi [/tex] therefore there must be a zero mass particle in the theory."

I really don't understand the conclusion. Why is the vacuum not invariant as I don't see the term |0> anywhere and why does it imply that there is a zero mass particle??? I can follow the math but not what the math means.

Any help appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Nambu Goldstone Boson

Loading...

Similar Threads for Nambu Goldstone Boson | Date |
---|---|

A Why is a glueball not massless, if it's a Goldstone boson? | Feb 6, 2018 |

Counting degrees of freedom for Goldstone bosons | Apr 6, 2014 |

Why is goldstone's theorem incorrect in gauge theories? | Feb 7, 2014 |

Why Eat Goldstone Boson? | Feb 25, 2012 |

Whatever happened to Thirring and Nambu-Jona-Lasinio | Oct 30, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**