Nanowire with charge neutrality in band gap

In summary, a nanowire with charge neutrality in band gap is a type of nanowire with an equal number of positive and negative charges within its band gap. This balance of charges can be achieved through various methods and has potential applications in nanoelectronics, quantum computing, and other nanoscale devices. The advantages of using these nanowires include efficient charge transport and high surface-to-volume ratio, but there are challenges in maintaining the balance of charges and optimizing their properties.
  • #1
Verdict
117
0
I'm working on a finite element simulation of the electrostatic potential [itex]V(r)[/itex] in and around semiconductor nanowires, based on solving Poisson's equation. While the details of the problem will follow shortly, the crux of where I run into trouble is that for nanowires it is important to include the effects of surface states. This is usually done in the form of a constant surface state density, but I want to include that the surface represents a capacitor with a variable charge as a function of the Fermi level.

To do so, I will include the so called charge neutrality level (CNL) [itex]\Phi_{NL}[/itex], following the paper Resolving ambiguities in nanowire field-effect transistor characterization by Heedt et al. (which should be open access). According to this, one can take the surface states and the charge neutrality level into account by assuming a finite density of surface states [itex]D_s[/itex] and a surface charge density given by
\begin{equation}
\sigma_s(r) = D_s\left[\Delta\Phi_{NL} - eV(r) - \chi_{InAs}\right]
\end{equation}
where [itex]\Delta\Phi_{NL} = \Phi_{NL} - E_c[/itex] is the location of the charge neutrality level w.r.t. the conduction band edge [itex]E_c[/itex] and [itex]\chi_{SE}[/itex] is the electron affinity of the semiconductor. Note that this expression is what sets the model apart from many others.

Now, the above gives us the surface density. What remains is to define the the space charge density. This can be done with the Kane model in the context of [itex]k \cdot p[/itex] perturbation theory, where one writes the electron concentration in terms of its density of states integrated with the fermi-dirac distribution
\begin{equation}
n(r) = \int_{E_c}^{\infty} \frac{(2m_e^*)^{3/2}}{2 \pi^2 \hbar^3}\sqrt{E-E_c} \frac{1}{\exp(\frac{E-V(r)}{k_B T})}dE
\end{equation}
and similarly for the hole concentration
\begin{equation}
p(r) = \int_{-\infty}^{E_c-E_g} \frac{(2m_p^*)^{3/2}}{2 \pi^2 \hbar^3}\sqrt{E-(E_c-E_g)} \left(1-\frac{1}{\exp(\frac{E-V(r)}{k_B T})}\right)dE
\end{equation}
leading to a space charge density of
\begin{equation}
\rho(r) = e\left[p(r) - n(r)\right]
\end{equation}
In the above [itex]m_{\{e,p\}}[/itex] are the effective electron and hole masses, and [itex]E_g[/itex] is the band gap.

Okay, great! At this stage we actually have all that is needed to set up a finite element simulation by drawing the hexagonal wire, defining the space charge and the surface charge density, surrounding the wire with something like air and filling in appropriate parameters.

But here we are getting to my problem. What the above model is supposed to do (if I understand it correctly) is find [itex]V(r)[/itex] so that it can match [itex]\rho(r)[/itex] and [itex]\sigma(r)[/itex], essentially bending the bands. This works for [itex]\chi_{NL} > E_c[/itex], where the CNL lies in the conduction band and results in an electron accumulation layer, and also for [itex]\chi_{NL} < E_c - E_g[/itex], where it lies in the valence band. But how should the above model work for [itex]E_c - E_g <\Delta\chi_{NL} < E_c[/itex]? In this region the space charge density expression is simply zero, as the integrals are only evaluated outside of the bandgap. So the model can't exactly modify [itex]V(r)[/itex] to bend the bands into the region.

If I understand it correctly the model thus needs a modification that allows the bands to go into the gap around the surface, and I am not sure how to do this. What I've come to realize is that what one essentially needs is that [itex]E_c \rightarrow E_c(V(r))[/itex]; this would make the limits of the integrals move with the potential, as they should. But how does the conduction band edge respond to the potential? That seems rather tricky..

[1]: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2015/NR/C5NR03608A#!divAbstract
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Your work on a finite element simulation of the electrostatic potential in and around semiconductor nanowires sounds very interesting. Including the effects of surface states in your model is crucial for accurately simulating the behavior of nanowires. I am familiar with the paper you mentioned by Heedt et al., and I agree that the inclusion of the charge neutrality level (CNL) is an important aspect of the model.

You have correctly identified that the model needs a modification to account for the region where the CNL lies between the conduction band and the valence band. In this region, the expression for the space charge density becomes zero, which does not accurately reflect the behavior of the nanowire. To address this issue, I suggest modifying the expression for the space charge density to include a term that accounts for the bending of the bands in the gap region.

One possible approach is to incorporate a term that represents the change in the conduction band edge (E_c) as a function of the potential (V(r)). This can be achieved by introducing a function, let's call it f(V(r)), that represents the shift in the conduction band edge due to the potential. This function can be determined by solving the Poisson's equation for the potential with the modified space charge density expression.

The modified expression for the space charge density would then become:

\begin{equation}
\rho(r) = e\left[p(r) - n(r) + f(V(r))\right]
\end{equation}

This modification would allow the model to accurately account for the bending of the bands in the gap region. I hope this suggestion helps you in your research. Best of luck with your simulation!
 

1. What is a nanowire with charge neutrality in band gap?

A nanowire with charge neutrality in band gap refers to a type of nanowire that has a balanced number of positive and negative charges within its band gap, a range of energy levels where no electron states can exist. This results in a neutral overall charge for the nanowire.

2. How is charge neutrality achieved in a nanowire's band gap?

Charge neutrality in a nanowire's band gap can be achieved through various methods, such as doping the nanowire with impurities or using specific fabrication techniques to create a balanced number of positive and negative charges.

3. What are the applications of nanowires with charge neutrality in band gap?

Nanowires with charge neutrality in band gap have various potential applications in nanoelectronics, including as components in transistors, sensors, and energy storage devices. They can also be used in quantum computing and as building blocks for nanoscale devices.

4. What are the advantages of using nanowires with charge neutrality in band gap?

One major advantage of using nanowires with charge neutrality in band gap is their ability to efficiently transport charges without significant energy loss. They also have a high surface-to-volume ratio, making them ideal for sensing applications. Additionally, they can be easily integrated into existing electronic devices.

5. Are there any challenges in working with nanowires with charge neutrality in band gap?

One of the main challenges in working with nanowires with charge neutrality in band gap is controlling and maintaining the balance of charges within the band gap. This requires precise fabrication techniques and can be affected by environmental factors such as temperature and humidity. Additionally, there is still ongoing research to optimize the properties and applications of these nanowires.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
986
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top