NASA's Stance on Warp Drive: Could FTL Travel Be Possible?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KilltheElite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nasa
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around NASA's stance on the possibility of faster-than-light (FTL) travel, particularly in relation to warp drive concepts. Participants explore theoretical implications, the feasibility of creating negative energy density, and the conditions under which FTL travel might be considered.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that NASA expresses uncertainty about the possibility of FTL travel, suggesting that it may not be impossible.
  • Another participant requests a link to the NASA page for clarity on their statements regarding warp drive.
  • A participant references a publication on warp drive and discusses the necessity of negative energy density for FTL travel, indicating that local FTL travel remains impossible.
  • There is mention of the analogy of a boat creating waves in water to illustrate the challenges of creating a stable warp bubble, with a caution about energy loss through gravitational waves.
  • One participant emphasizes that, despite speculation, locally traveling faster than light has not been challenged and remains impossible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of FTL travel, with some suggesting it may be possible under certain conditions while others maintain that it is fundamentally impossible. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions of negative energy density and the stability of warp bubbles, as well as the unresolved nature of energy requirements for such concepts.

KilltheElite
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
While on NASA Glen research website this morning I came across their page about warp drive. In the first few lines they say they are not sure if faster than light travel is possible. Not sure? So does that mean NASA thinks it may not be impossible to travel fater than light either then.

I was under the impression it was absolutley impossible for humans to travel faster than light and will never be possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you give us a link to the page you saw, please? This will enable up to be clear on what they are saying, and to ensure that your question is answered correctly.
 
Aye it is http://www.nasa.gov/lb/centers/glenn/research/warp/warpstat.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They say it themselves : Maturity (?)
:smile:
Well, it has been published in The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity (Class.Quant.Grav. 11 (1994) L73-L77)
and you get something like http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/12/Star_Trek_Warp_Field.png

But the key is that you need large amounts of negative energy density. If you can do that, indeed you violate the energy conditions of Hawking and Penrose.
I was under the impression it was absolutley impossible for humans to travel faster than light and will never be possible.
It is still impossible to travel faster than light locally. In this speculation, you need to create a bubble around you, traveling with you, within which you are at rest (thus saving the day for the matter your spacecraft is made up of, which is bound by electromagnetism as pointed out in the text you linked). It would be kind of similar to what happens when a boat travels fast on water : it creates a wave because it drags water around itself (this analogy has strong limitations however). This example is intended to show that there is no magic : if you really were to do that, it is expected that you will loose huge amounts of energy by gravitational waves. So even accepting the idea that you can create such negative energy density regions around your spacecraft , you will still need to find a way to make them stable, and this might require too much energy anyway.

I think the two things you should rememer :
  • speculation
  • locally, you still do not travel faster than light. This has never been challenged I think
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K