Hello everyone! Applying the Iterated Elimination of Strictly Dominated Strategies (IESDS) to a game resulted with the solution of the Nash Equilibrium. Actually that specific "quadrant" of the matrix is the: * Pareto optimal * Nash Equilibrium * Dominant strategies (through IESDS). This is a Matrix that shows what I'm talking about: Quadrant (1, 1) is a Nash Equilibrium, the solution of IESDS, and the Pareto optimum scenario. What I'm trying to ask is: are my results wrong or this can actually happen? Did I come up correctly with the Nash Equilibrium? Is the IESDS solution really the quadrant (1, 1)? Thanks for reading (and possibly answer). Cheers!