National Ignition Facility (NIF)

  • Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date
  • #1
970
3

Main Question or Discussion Point


The genesis of this design as described to me is a single 980 nm Pump Diode which is fiber-optically split into 192 fiber-optical 'beam lines' using a Fiber Bragg Grating. The 'laser amplifiers' then amplifies this pulse more than 1 million times which is propagated to the target chamber.

The design pulls power from a main grid into a 'power conditioning system', which is analogous to a giant battery which discharges this power into 10,000 'flash lamps', each around seven feet high which is opticalised into 'laser glass' which absorbs these photons and converts them into ultraviolet laser energy which is then transferred through the system to the target chamber which converts the ultraviolet photons into x-ray photons and fires onto the target, which is a tiny spherical pellet containing hydrogen isotopes, which produces a nuclear fusion reaction.

For the nanosecond that the NIF fires, it discharges more than 1000 times the energy that the entire earth is using in that same nanosecond.

The amount of energy required to charge this device is claimed to be only US$5.

The reactor is scheduled to become operational in 2008.

The National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California is a 192-beam, 1.8 Megajoule, 500 terawatt, 351 nm laser system currently undergoing commissioning of its first laser beams. When completed in 2008, NIF will be the world's largest laser facility for inertial confinement fusion, high-energy-density physics, and basic science studies.

NIF reactor design:
http://www.aip.org/png/images/png2.gif [Broken]

Reference:
http://www.llnl.gov/nif/
http://www.llnl.gov/nif/programs/dir_library.html
http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/lib_animations.html
http://www.aip.org/png/html/nif.htm [Broken]
http://www.spie.org/Conferences/Calls/04/pw/lase/index.cfm?fuseaction=lasenatlab [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
396
2
Wow, sure sounds impressive!
 
  • #3
Morbius
Science Advisor
Dearly Missed
1,125
6
theCandyman said:
Wow, sure sounds impressive!
Candyman,

You can see some more pictures of NIF at:

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/lib_highlights.html

For example, the 1st picture in the 3rd row shows the cables from the capacitor banks that
Orion1 spoke of.

The 3rd picture in the 2nd row show 2 of the 3 robots that handle / transport the laser
amplifiers. The 3 robots are named, "Enterprise", "Defiant", and "Voyager".

The 3rd picture in the 3rd row is of a Plasma Electrode Pockels Cell. It is a high speed
optical switch that channel the laser pulse toward the amplifiers or out to the target.

The 3rd picture in the 4th row shows the top of the blue target chamber.

The 3rd picture in the 5th row shows a big crystal of KDP - Potassium DiPhosphate.
KDP has non-linear optical properties. It can be used to double and triple the frequency
of the laser light. The NIF neodynium-glass amplifiers actually amplify light at
frequency in the near infrared.

You can read more in a article from the Sept. 2003 issue of the LLNL publication
"Science and Technology Review" written by Ed Moses:

http://www.llnl.gov/str/September03/Moses.html

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
  • #4
396
2
Is that first picture in thr fifth row the target?

And after thinking about this for a while, how do you get 1000 times the earth's power output in one second using only five dollars worth of energy? That seems a bit like the cold fusion claims, putting little in and getting a huge amount out.
 
  • #5
970
3
For the nanosecond that the NIF fires, it discharges more than 1000 times the energy that the entire earth is using in that same nanosecond.

It is a 'nano'-second, which appears to approximate to 500 Terawatts.
1 nano = 10^-9 and 1 tera = 10^12

Basically the original photons originate from a simple 'laser diode' which can fit in the palm of your hand, however, these photons when amplified enough can catalyze a nuclear fusion reaction.

I do not have the exact design specifications, so I cannot say how their power equation was derived. It should be listed in one of their published engineering papers.
 
  • #6
Morbius
Science Advisor
Dearly Missed
1,125
6
theCandyman said:
Is that first picture in thr fifth row the target?
Candyman,

No - that's the device that holds the target in position - the target at that
scale would be too small to really see. Here's an article from LLNL's
Science and Technology Review that shows the target and the surrounding
"hohlraum" in Figure 3:

http://www.llnl.gov/str/Haan.html

And after thinking about this for a while, how do you get 1000 times the earth's power output in one second using only five dollars worth of energy? That seems a bit like the cold fusion claims, putting little in and getting a huge amount out.
Energy IS conserved - but power - the rate at which energy flows isn't.

You charge up the capacitors for several minutes - giving you a certain
amount of energy - and then discharge them in a very short time - like a
nanosecond. You don't create any energy - you just make it flow very
fast for a very short period of time.

The electronic flash on your camera works exactly the same way.

Let's say we can draw 100 watts [ like a single electric light ] from the
power grid. Let's charge a capacitor bank for 1000 seconds [ about 20 mins ].

So we have 100,000 watt-seconds of energy or 100,000 Joules stored. Now
let's discharge that capacitor bank in 1 nano-second or 10^(-9) seconds.

What's the power?

The power is energy per unit time. The energy is 100,000 watt-seconds or
10^(5) watt-seconds. The time to discharge is 1 nanosecond = 10^(-9)
seconds.

The power P = 100,000 watt-seconds / (10^(-9) seconds) = 10^(14) watts
or 100 terrawatts.

That's twice the amount of the energy that the entire Earth uses in
that nanosecond. We didn't create any energy - we just had to spend
20 minutes storing energy at a rate of 100 watts [ like a lightbulb ]. We
just discharged it fast.

Nothing like cold fusion which claimed more energy than was put in.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: National Ignition Facility (NIF)

Replies
1
Views
799
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
32
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Top