Hello! I am reading Schutz A first course in GR and he introduces the Nearly Lorentz coordinate systems as ones having a metric such that ##g_{\alpha\beta} = \eta_{\alpha\beta} + h_{\alpha\beta}##, with h a small deviation from the normal Minkowski metric. Then he introduces the Background Lorentz transformations (this is section 8.3 in the second edition) in which all the points are transformed as ##x^{\bar\alpha}=\Lambda_\beta^{\bar\alpha}x^\beta##. Applying this transformation to g he gets in the end that h transforms as ##h_{\bar\alpha\bar\beta}=\Lambda_\mu^{\bar\alpha}\Lambda_\nu^{\bar\beta} h_{\mu\nu}## and from here he says that we can treat h as if it was a tensor in SR and this simplify the calculations a lot. Can someone explain to me why ones need all these calculations for this? I am sure I am missing something but h is the difference between g and ##\eta## so isn't it a tensor, just because it is the difference between 2 tensors? Why do you need a proof for it? Moreover Schutz says that h "it is, of course, not a tensor, but just a piece of ##g_{\alpha\beta}##". So can someone explain to me why isn't h a tensor and why my logic is flawed? Thank you!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Nearly Lorentz Coordinate Systems

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**