Need an Arxiv endorsement for preprinting my paper

  • Thread starter BDOA
  • Start date
  • #26
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
35,977
4,680
No real need to quote a ream of statistics, is there? The number of articles referring to 'The Death of Science', of 'Education'... is self evident.

The barrier to a new, or novel thought process is incredibly restrictive. This process eventually ends up squashing out all new ideas & innovation - until the next logic revolution advances. This has been the way of the ages & is nothing new. It is merely a cyclical repetition - a wave.

No, you are confusing the death of "quality". I don't see any decline in the number of enrollment in education. I do see a decline in the number of enrollment in physics, which I had fully documented elsewhere (in the US, there is a surge in physics enrollment this past year, both in high school and in colleges).

What is the problem here is what has been termed as the Cult of the Amateur, where people no longer care where they get their information and the quality of that information, and everyone who seems to think that since they have an opinion on something becomes an "expert". If I were one of those people, I'd give away my endorsement as freely as I blink my eyes.

The OP has a "paper". My advice has been to find an expert in that area of study and let him/her review it to see if he/she would endorse it. No one should endorse something he/she isn't an expert in. I do not see what is wrong with that advice.

Zz.
 
  • #27
Fair enough comments. I apologise if I seemed a little confrontational.

I was a little shocked, to be honest, by many of the other posts - you had actually provided suggestions & were helpful within your reference frame. The OP was looking for a sponsor - which seemed to be a simple request. The rest of the thread then seemed like a battle-ground between posters for & against such formats as arXiv.

My personal view is that arXiv & its fellows, present an alternative medium & way forward. In many ways it represents a paradigm shift away from the conventional Journal system. This will bring it friends & enemies - analogous to the Windows-Linux debate. Only time will tell which way things move.
 
  • #28
J77
1,083
1
I was a little shocked, to be honest, by many of the other posts - you had actually provided suggestions & were helpful within your reference frame. The OP was looking for a sponsor - which seemed to be a simple request. The rest of the thread then seemed like a battle-ground between posters for & against such formats as arXiv.
The thread is but two pages long.

I see no "battle-ground" -- advice, when given, is constructive. With the general opinion of not asking for "sponsers" on a bb.

The pros/cons of arXiv is one of those regular topics on PF.
 
  • #29
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
35,977
4,680
Fair enough comments. I apologise if I seemed a little confrontational.

I was a little shocked, to be honest, by many of the other posts - you had actually provided suggestions & were helpful within your reference frame. The OP was looking for a sponsor - which seemed to be a simple request. The rest of the thread then seemed like a battle-ground between posters for & against such formats as arXiv.

My personal view is that arXiv & its fellows, present an alternative medium & way forward. In many ways it represents a paradigm shift away from the conventional Journal system. This will bring it friends & enemies - analogous to the Windows-Linux debate. Only time will tell which way things move.

Actually, ArXiv has had to change from the way it was conceived and implement the endorsement system because it was getting to many crap. Even now, it has outright rejected flat out crackpottery, even though a few get through - some of us had to alert the admin over there on some of the these stuff.

While manuscripts appearing on ArXiv are actively used in field of studies such as high energy physics and string/etc., for formal academic and funding purposes, these are still not counted on highly. You still need to use peer-reviewed citations, especially if you want a promotion, get tenure, or want that pot of money from a funding agency. Even in high energy physics, these Arxiv papers that have been actively cited eventually end up in published somewhere. Their appearance on ArXiv bridges the gap between it being "completed" and being published.

So no, I do not see ArXiv as replacing peer-reviewed journals. It has its place and purpose, but I do not see it being a replacement.

Zz.
 

Related Threads on Need an Arxiv endorsement for preprinting my paper

  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top