No real need to quote a ream of statistics, is there? The number of articles referring to 'The Death of Science', of 'Education'... is self evident.
The barrier to a new, or novel thought process is incredibly restrictive. This process eventually ends up squashing out all new ideas & innovation - until the next logic revolution advances. This has been the way of the ages & is nothing new. It is merely a cyclical repetition - a wave.
No, you are confusing the death of "quality". I don't see any decline in the number of enrollment in education. I do see a decline in the number of enrollment in physics, which I had fully documented elsewhere (in the US, there is a surge in physics enrollment this past year, both in high school and in colleges).
What is the problem here is what has been termed as the Cult of the Amateur, where people no longer care where they get their information and the quality of that information, and everyone who seems to think that since they have an opinion on something becomes an "expert". If I were one of those people, I'd give away my endorsement as freely as I blink my eyes.
The OP has a "paper". My advice has been to find an expert in that area of study and let him/her review it to see if he/she would endorse it. No one should endorse something he/she isn't an expert in. I do not see what is wrong with that advice.