http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html#Ch15-S3(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm reading through Feynman's chapter on special relativity in the first volume of his books in order to have a more comprehensive idea of it as I go through the special relativity hw given to us as extra credit for our electromagnetism class.

I'm having a tough time however, understanding the logic behind the math in section 3 in the link titled "The Michelson-Morley experiment". When Feynman introduces eq. 15.5(that is, the equation that describes the time it would take for the beam of light to travel to the mirror perpendicular to the direction of the earth's motion in orbit and back, i.e., the one that Lorentz didn't add the length contraction to later), and then afterwards wants us to compare it to the equation that describes the time the beam would take to the other mirror parallel to the motion and back, he says the following:

"And behold, these modifications arenot the same—the time to go to C and back is a little less than the time to E and back, even though the mirrors are equidistant from B, and all we have to do is to measure that difference with precision."

My problem is the equation of time(2t_{3}) describing the trip to mirror C(the perpendicular-to-motion mirror) and back involves a square root of the same denominator in the equation of time(t_{1}+t_{2}) describing the trip to mirror E(the parallel-to-motion mirror) and back. By that logic then, it has a smaller denominator than the equation of the latter, and therefore since the numerators are equivalent(as Feynman himself points out), shouldn't it produce a larger magnitude of time than the latter?(meaning, isn't the math actually saying the opposite: that the beam will take longer to reach C and back than it would to reach E and back?).

Not that I'm getting lost in the math or anything that I forgot the intention of the experiment, but that my misunderstanding of his description of the experiment is bothering me enough to not carry on reading the rest of the chapter until I understand what he was really trying to say.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Need help understanding the Michelson-Morley experiment

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Need help understanding | Date |
---|---|

B Need help understanding proper distances in SR/GR | Jun 8, 2016 |

Need help understanding electromagnetics and relativity | Oct 4, 2015 |

Need help understanding Einstien's Light Clock experiment | Jul 24, 2014 |

Need help understanding this math | Feb 16, 2013 |

Need help understanding frames of reference in GR | Sep 26, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**