(Need Verifications) Wear Rate for adhesive rubbing of 2 materials

  1. Dear all members,

    I just need anyone of you to verify my system and some equations I have worked out for my problem below. Please feel free to point out any flaws in my reasoning and formula applications.

    Problem Definition: Two flat blocks (different materials, Fiberglass and Rubber) rubbing against each other on 1 flat plane in 1 direction. Find out when the amount of surface thickness loss of rubber reaches our defined limit, ℝ.

    1) Only Rubber deforms and fiberglass's deformation is neglected.

    Logics behind:
    1) During the wearing process , strain rate/loading force decreases as the thickness of rubber decreases SO the equation has to be an integral instead. It should be defined in the range from 0 to X(meter). Presumably, when rubber has rubbed against fiberglass for distance x, the amount of thickness loss on rubber is equal to our designated limit, ℝ.


    Wear formula (I assume it is an adhesive wear?):
    w=k*L/H where k is a wear constant of rubber; L is the loading force and H is the hardness of material.
    w will be in terms of Volume removed due to wear Per distance traveled by rubber(Contact surface, A) or fiberglass(infinite large Area).
    Re-arrange w a little bit, dividing it by Area, A, and it become wt for which the unit is surface thickness loss/ distance traveled)

    Equations Work Flow:

    Total thickness loss from total distance x traveled equal to ℝ :

    (intergral defined on range 0 to x)

    ∫ wt dx= ∫ (k*L/(H*A) ) dx<= ℝ

    a) L= σ/A= Eε/A
    b) ε=dL / L ..............[dL denotes for current compressed thickness which is equal to dL0- ∫ wt dx(amount of thickness loss) WHILE L denotes for the current thickness of the rubber which is equal to L0(original thickness)- ∫ wt dx(amount of thickness loss)]

    Define ε as a function of x (strain rate after traveling distance x)
    Turns out ε is a function of itself which is a function of x.

    Strain rate at distance x can be given by:

    ε= (dL0- ∫ wt dx)/ (L0-∫ wt dx)


    ε= [dL0- ∫(E*k*ε)/(A*H) dx]/ [L0-∫(E*k*ε)/(A*H) dx]

    Then we solve ε:
    ε becomes a quadratic equation

    then find ε in terms of those constants and variable x.

    then put ε into the original function below to find x,

    ∫ wt dx =∫ (k*L/(H*A) ) dx <= ℝ where L=σ/A=(E*ε)/A

    um....is that workable....or just plain wrong?
    Thanks Report
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thead via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Draft saved Draft deleted