Let f:I->R and let c in I. I want to negate the statements: "f has limit L at c" and "f is continuous at c". Are these correct?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

f does not have limit L at c if there exists e>0 such that for some sequence {x_n} converging to c, |f(x_n)-L|>e for every n.

f is not continuous at c if there exists e>0 such that for some sequence {x_n} converging to c, |f(x_n)-f(c)|>e for every n.

edit: also, what is the negation of "f has a limit at c"?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Negating Limits and Continuity

Loading...

Similar Threads for Negating Limits Continuity | Date |
---|---|

B Question about a limit definition | Feb 27, 2018 |

I Q about finding area with double/volume with triple integral | Sep 13, 2017 |

B Definite integrals with +ve and -ve values | Jun 10, 2017 |

I Should we consider negative axis when finding the volume? | Dec 21, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**