In the transition from "basic" quantum theory to quantum field theory, both in the derivation of the Gordon-Klein and of the Dirac-equations, there is a big problem with solutions with negative energies. Can anyone explain me why this is being considered a big problem in the first place (it seems obvious to textbook authors). After all, energy is anyhow only determined up to a constant. And electrons within atoms are generally assigned negative energies.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This is probably one of those stupid questions with obvious answers which people just forget to mention. The more grateful I would be for an answer.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Negative Energy

Loading...

Similar Threads for Negative Energy | Date |
---|---|

I Negative and Positive energy modes of KG equation | Dec 18, 2017 |

I Relationship between negative mass, energy and antimatter | Jun 30, 2017 |

B Why does waveform exp[iwt] have negative kinetic energy? | May 10, 2017 |

A Quantum Interest Conjecture and negative energy-density | Feb 12, 2017 |

I Calculation of negative energy density in a casimir cavity | Feb 6, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**