- #1

somasimple

Gold Member

- 759

- 5

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter somasimple
- Start date

- #1

somasimple

Gold Member

- 759

- 5

- #2

- 4,662

- 5

- #3

- 142

- 1

what is the second circuit for, DC analysis?

- #4

- 4,254

- 1

Both are a bunch or parts connected together. But is either one a circuit?

- #5

somasimple

Gold Member

- 759

- 5

Since R

- #6

uart

Science Advisor

- 2,781

- 9

In general though it will be a good approximation at sufficiently low frequencies but very much a poor approximation at frequencies starting somewhere about [itex]\frac{1}{2 \pi R_1 C_1}[/itex] and higher.

- #7

somasimple

Gold Member

- 759

- 5

So what you were really asking is whether the second circuit is valid as an approximate equivalent of the first. Even that question is a little vague. Equivalent in terms of input impedance or equivalent in terms of some two-port parameter like vout/vin or whatever (though no vout or vin are labelled on the diagram).

Exactly. It is a huge simplification but it may help to compute the resulting (parallel/serial) resistance and capacitor.

- #8

- 30

- 0

It really depends on what you're trying to do with the circuit. In many ways it is the [tex]R_2[/tex] that is irrelevant (essentially an open in many cases).

It's late, but, it seems like you are modeling some sort of delay or transmission line. The voltage transfer function is just 3 voltage dividers back to back, giving (check my math on this): [tex]\frac{1}{6 \ast \left(s \ast R_1 \ast C_1 +1 +\frac{R_1}{R_2}\right)^3}[/tex] with [tex]R_1<<R_2[/tex], this reduces to [tex]\frac{1}{6 \ast \left(s \ast R_1 \ast C_1 +1 \right)^3}[/tex] giving you 3 poles close to [tex]-\frac{1}{R_1 \ast C_1}[/tex].

From the transfer function, you know its, ac response, and it's impulse and step responses. You can even do the root-locus if you really wanted.

This is assuming the load impedance is essantially an open.

It's late, but, it seems like you are modeling some sort of delay or transmission line. The voltage transfer function is just 3 voltage dividers back to back, giving (check my math on this): [tex]\frac{1}{6 \ast \left(s \ast R_1 \ast C_1 +1 +\frac{R_1}{R_2}\right)^3}[/tex] with [tex]R_1<<R_2[/tex], this reduces to [tex]\frac{1}{6 \ast \left(s \ast R_1 \ast C_1 +1 \right)^3}[/tex] giving you 3 poles close to [tex]-\frac{1}{R_1 \ast C_1}[/tex].

From the transfer function, you know its, ac response, and it's impulse and step responses. You can even do the root-locus if you really wanted.

This is assuming the load impedance is essantially an open.

Last edited:

- #9

- 207

- 0

Why dont you calculate both, compare results and post us in :)

- #10

- 4,662

- 5

- #11

somasimple

Gold Member

- 759

- 5

That is good idea and I'll simulate these circuits.Why dont you calculate both, compare results and post us in :)

I use a demo version of http://www.spectrum-soft.com/index.shtm" [Broken]

I'll take a look at these hits.

Last edited by a moderator:

Share: