UFO or Dead Pixel? What's Flying Across the Moon?

In summary, the YouTuber claims that a pixel-sized object can be seen against the moon in a video and that it could not be a satellite because it would have to be larger than the smallest details visible on the moon. They also mention that it could be a dead pixel on the camera.
  • #1
B0b-A
155
32
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/16/ufo-flies-across-moon



I don't know what method is being used to keep the moon in frame,
but if it's a fixed telephoto lens the black dot "UFO" could be a dead-pixel.

If the 1 pixel-sized black-dot was a real object orbiting Earth , (rather than an artefact),
and it takes a over minute to cross the moon it would have to be about a kilometre across ?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think people are letting their imaginations get the better of them (though I'm not even sure what the claim is!). While the video is kinda interesting, a single pixel sillouetted against the moon could very easily just be a satellite. I get satellites spoiling my astrophotos all the time.

I don't see where you would get your estimate of it being 1 km across. A single pixel shadow makes it an arbitrarily small size.
 
  • #3
The object looks larger than the smallest details visible on the moon, which would suggest more than one camera pixel was involved.

An object in low Earth orbit crosses the moon (full diameter) in about 3 seconds, 45 seconds would need about 4000km distance or a large eccentricity. Unusual for a satellite. A realistic size of 10m at a distance of 4000km would also require the moon to have a diameter of the order of 30'000 px, otherwise the object would be much smaller than a camera pixel and the pixel would not look so dark.
Something further away would be faster and therefore not in an orbit. A NEO would certainly be possible, but then it would have to be quite dark (possible) or in the shadow of Earth (unlikely, but possible).

The video could be edited to enhance the contrast, of course, then things look differently.
 
  • #4
Looks like a dead pixel to me.
 
  • #5
mfb said:
The object looks larger than the smallest details visible on the moon, which would suggest more than one camera pixel was involved.
So a minute speck of something on the sensor blocking a group of pixels, rather than 1 pixel.
[ I've just noticed there's no atmospheric turbulence on the black-dot UFO : if real it's outline (and value) would fluctuate.
That it is a constant shape and value is consistent with it being an in-camera artefact ].
mfb said:
A realistic size of 10m at a distance of 4000km would also require the moon to have a diameter of the order of 30'000 px, otherwise the object would be much smaller than a camera pixel and the pixel would not look so dark.
The YouTuber said the video is 1080 pixels, (@1:17-1:20), and that the black dot UFO can take a minute to cross the moon's disk.
If it was a real object orbiting Earth with an orbital velocity twice that of the moon , ( from Earth the moon appears to travel through it's own diameter in about 2 minutes ), then it would be about 1/3rd the distance from the Earth to the moon , and in the 1-10Km range , if it was real and orbiting Earth.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
B0b-A said:
from Earth the moon appears to travel through it's own diameter in about 2 minutes
Yes, but that is completely dominated by the rotation of earth. If you watch the motion of the moon in an inertial system (relative to stars for example) this time is significantly longer. The object, if real, has to be significantly faster or closer than the moon - a medium Earth orbit would be consistent with the speed.
 
  • #7
I believe in UFO's, but not discovered ones or hoaxes. For such a complex race to be spot by us, on a camera, they would have to be moronic at best or declaring war. Why would they be by the Moon, of which they will have seen thousands? They would already know everything they "need" to know about us through a telescope or common knowledge? The chances of them finding and reaching us in this ridiculously huge, spaced-apart galaxy alone is slim at best IMO, even if life here is by the billions, most won't be complex I'm sure. Studying life seems irrelevant by the time you can go as far as them through the Milky Way. Good News, we don't have to worry about dying or be test subjects for awhile! :p
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I've had second thoughts , artificial-satellites are a contender ...

Surprisingly they can be photographed , (admittedly as points) , with modest camera equipment,
even though they are over 10,000 Km away and less than 100m across ...

Geosats_compilation.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geosats_compilation.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #10

1. What is a UFO?

A UFO, or Unidentified Flying Object, is any object or phenomenon in the sky that cannot be easily identified or explained. These objects are often associated with extraterrestrial life or advanced technology.

2. How do we differentiate between a UFO and a dead pixel?

A dead pixel refers to a small dot on a digital screen that is no longer functioning, while a UFO is a physical object in the sky. To differentiate between the two, we can observe the movement and behavior of the object, as well as gather evidence from multiple sources such as eyewitness accounts and radar data.

3. Can a dead pixel appear to be flying across the moon?

No, a dead pixel is a stationary object on a digital screen and cannot physically move or fly across the moon. However, a UFO can appear to be flying across the moon if it is actually a physical object in the sky.

4. How can we determine if something flying across the moon is a UFO?

To determine if something flying across the moon is a UFO, we can analyze the object's characteristics such as shape, size, speed, and flight pattern. We can also consider factors such as the location, time, and weather conditions of the sighting. Additionally, consulting experts and conducting further investigations can help in identifying the object.

5. Are there any known explanations for "UFOs" flying across the moon?

There can be various explanations for objects flying across the moon, such as natural phenomena like meteors or man-made objects like satellites or aircraft. However, some sightings may remain unexplained and could potentially be attributed to extraterrestrial activity or advanced technology.

Similar threads

Writing: Read Only What Does Great Lakes Earth Look Like from Space?
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
1
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 242)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top