How did you get that? I think that to solve such problems (where a simple superposition doesn't give you the answer), a discrete fourier transform is required, and then the final integral which gives the resistance looks very tricky.Is it 0.916333... ohms?
Damn, I missed dinner!
The article uses the same principle of taking the fourier transform and applying ohm's law. The integral one gets after the fourier transform is (eqn 25 in the article)This http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9909120" [Broken] (see appendix A) gives an absolute mess.
I actually did use a superposition - I don't know why it fails! =(How did you get that? I think that to solve such problems (where a simple superposition doesn't give you the answer), a discrete fourier transform is required, and then the final integral which gives the resistance looks very tricky.
From "xkcd.com"[/URL] :
A friend of mine finished school some years ago with a BS in physics and immediately chucked it all to become a lawyer. After seeing this Nerd Sniping XKCD strip I sent it to him on a workday to see if he was truly a lawyer or if he would be sniped, along with with full disclosure of my intentions. Couple days later I checked back, sure enough, four billable hours went down the drain. :devil: Good thing he wasn't standing in the road.
BTW, engineer's solution: assume the infinite grid looks like a short to any one node except for the four resistors directly attached into the node. The parallel resistance into the node then is 1/4 ohm and therefore the resistance between any two, non-adjacent nodes is 1/2 ohm. With actual (cheap) 20% resistors thats close enough to the actual (.7xx is it?)
Yes, ok, I'll have to make clear I'm using really cheap resistors when I go for the Google interview.The resistance betweeb any two horizontally or vertically adjacent nodes is exactly 1/2 ohms. The resistance between nodes further apart than that is not. That 20% fudge on top of 0.5 ohms yields 0.6 ohms, not 0.773 ohms.
Think I'll code up a quick sim for fun.Its even worse for nodes further apart than that.
Why don't you try working out the answer for nodes separated by two diagonal hops?