- #1

- 9

- 2

Does anyone happen to know the value of ν∑f for natural uranium? Here ν is the average number of neutron released from fission and ∑f is the macroscopic fission cross section of uranium.

Kirk

- Thread starter Kirk Truax
- Start date

- #1

- 9

- 2

Does anyone happen to know the value of ν∑f for natural uranium? Here ν is the average number of neutron released from fission and ∑f is the macroscopic fission cross section of uranium.

Kirk

- #2

jim hardy

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,839

- 4,881

I'll wager there's a CANDU reactor engineer aboard who knows.

.

.

- #3

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 18,980

- 2,326

Developing a value for ∑

Does anyone happen to know the value of ν∑f for natural uranium? Here ν is the average number of neutron released from fission and ∑f is the macroscopic fission cross section of uranium.

Kirk

- #4

jim hardy

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,839

- 4,881

Natural U being mostly this ,,The value of ν depends on neutron energy,

https://t2.lanl.gov/nis/data/endf/endfv-pdf/u238.pdf

- #5

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 18,980

- 2,326

Yeah, but that's for fast neutrons. Fast neutrons from fission have a peak distribution around 1 MeV and the energy distribution falls off rapidly up to 10 MeV. With d+t fusion, one gets up to 14.1 MeV neutrons. To go higher, one pretty much needs 20+ MeV protons and spallation reactions.Natural U being mostly this ,,

https://t2.lanl.gov/nis/data/endf/endfv-pdf/u238.pdf

The OP did mention whether he flux was thermal, epithermal or fast.

- #6

jim hardy

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,839

- 4,881

Fixed it for yaThe OP didn't mention whether he flux was thermal, epithermal or fast.

old jim

- #7

- 9

- 2

Hey guys,Yeah, but that's for fast neutrons. Fast neutrons from fission have a peak distribution around 1 MeV and the energy distribution falls off rapidly up to 10 MeV. With d+t fusion, one gets up to 14.1 MeV neutrons. To go higher, one pretty much needs 20+ MeV protons and spallation reactions.

The OP did mention whether he flux was thermal, epithermal or fast.

You were right, I definitely did leave out that vital bit of information. I was simply looking for the macroscopic cross section for thermal neutrons. I was modeling a sub-critical pile with a large amount of graphite moderation. Turns out I was able to find a ν∑f for UO2 to thermal neutrons to be about 0.2274 cm^-1. This was from the good ole D&H tables.

Kirk

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 17K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 10K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 10K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 6K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 933

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 8K