- #1

marcus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 24,738

- 787

noted in surrogate sticky

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=682928#post682928

I printed this paper out and tried unsuccessfully for an hour or so to understand his argument. maybe someone else can elucidate. I am stumped.

The paper is short, 5 pages, with few formulas. It goes over the

argument he gave at the Dublin conference last year, about BH

information loss (not). I was hoping when his paper on this came out

that I would understand his reasoning better, but it didnt happen.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=682928#post682928

I printed this paper out and tried unsuccessfully for an hour or so to understand his argument. maybe someone else can elucidate. I am stumped.

The paper is short, 5 pages, with few formulas. It goes over the

argument he gave at the Dublin conference last year, about BH

information loss (not). I was hoping when his paper on this came out

that I would understand his reasoning better, but it didnt happen.

Last edited: