You mention the April paper by Bianchi et al. Can you point me to the line or lines in that paper that you are talking about? I am not so much interested in the May and October papers of Mikovic, which would be "after the fact". I'd like to see what problems Bianchi et al discovered and addressed.Citations apart, their content of their criticism is discussed in Rovelli's two latest summary papers, and addressed in Bianchi et al, so it is criticism of substance.
I responded to you here:No, I didn't. Lol.
Anyway. I am waiting Marcus to open a thread about Rovelli's new paper. It seems to be the best paper of this year, in my opinion. But I want him to give an explanation, to be sure of that.