Hi, I've just finished reading the article "Reality Bits" in the(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

January 25-31, 2014 edition of New Scientist.

These links are introductions for those of you who do not read

New Scientist:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...aster-bit.html [Broken]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4535

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-bit

Can anybody explain what Dr. Wootters is talking about?

I don't think he is reformulating QM with the mere substitution

of sqrt(-1) for its matrix identity since that would only yield a

notationally equivalent and trivial reformulation and the math

would not change.

But instead, I think Dr. Wooters has a new approach to

avoiding imaginary numbers in QM.

At this point I don't have a clue what Dr. Wooters is proposing

and any incite would be greately appreciated.

EDIT: and some insights would be appreciated too.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# New theory of the UBIT

Loading...

Similar Threads - theory UBIT | Date |
---|---|

A How to construct a spin-3/2 theory from the ground up | Mar 2, 2018 |

A Meaning of phase transitions in lattice gauge theories | Feb 13, 2018 |

B Constrains in E8xE8 heterotic superstring theory | Feb 12, 2018 |

A I want to know the exact problems of Merging GR and QM | Feb 11, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**