Why Can't Objects Accelerate to Light Speed?

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between velocity and mass, and whether objects can be accelerated to or beyond the speed of light. It is explained that as an object's speed approaches the speed of light, its energy increases without limit and it becomes impossible to reach the speed of light due to the way that speeds actually add. This is in contrast to the classical law of velocity addition which is only an approximation for small speeds.
  • #1
trigonatus
3
0
From a quick search of the forum is appears that an increase in velocity does not result in an increase in mass. If this is correct why can't objects be accelerated to light speed and beyond?

If every action causes an equal and opposite reaction, what force stops an object from reaching light speed?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Check out our current featured thread at https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-relativistic-mass-and-why-is-it-not-used-much.783220/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
An object's energy increases without limit (##E \rightarrow \infty##) as ##v \rightarrow c##.

totalenergy2.gif


As you give an object more and more energy, by continuing to "push" on it somehow, its speed continues to increase, but more and more "slowly" as it gets closer to c. It can never actually reach a speed of c, because that would require an infinite amount of energy, which is impossible.
 
  • #4
Thank you both.

Why more and more slowly as it gets closer to c? Is there some type of additional resistance or counter force that causes the decrease in acceleration as c is approached?
 
  • #5
trigonatus said:
Thank you both.

Why more and more slowly as it gets closer to c? Is there some type of additional resistance or counter force that causes the decrease in acceleration as c is approached?

There is no counterforce needed - it follows from the way that speeds add.

You are almost certainly thinking in terms of the classical law of velocity addition, which says that if A is moving at speed ##u## relative to B, and C is moving at speed ##v## relative to B, then C is moving at speed ##(u+v)## relative to A. Using that law, a spaceship moving at .99c relative to A and at rest relative to B could fire its engines and accelerate to .02c relative to B - and then it would be moving at 1.01c relative to A.

But that's not really how speeds add - the classical ##(u+v)## is an approximation that only works for speeds that are small compared with the speed of light. The more accurate law that you have to use for speeds near that of light is ##(u+v)/(1+uv)##; use this and you'll see that even though nothing prevents the ship from accelerating just as you would expect, it still can't get above c relative to any observer.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Now, I understand.
Thank you.
 

1. Why is it impossible for objects to accelerate to light speed?

The speed of light, also known as the universal speed limit, is a fundamental constant in the universe. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases exponentially and requires an infinite amount of energy to continue accelerating. This makes it impossible for objects to reach the speed of light.

2. Can anything travel faster than the speed of light?

No, according to our current understanding of physics, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Even if an object were to somehow reach the speed of light, it would require an infinite amount of energy to travel any faster.

3. What are the consequences of breaking the speed of light?

If an object were to somehow break the speed of light, it would violate the laws of physics as we know them. This would lead to a breakdown of causality, meaning that cause and effect would no longer be predictable. It would also require an infinite amount of energy, which is impossible to achieve.

4. Is there a limit to how fast objects can travel?

Yes, the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit in the universe. Objects can approach this speed but can never exceed it. This limit is a fundamental aspect of the laws of physics and has been confirmed through numerous experiments and observations.

5. Could advancements in technology allow for objects to reach the speed of light in the future?

While it is impossible to say for certain, it is highly unlikely that objects will ever be able to reach the speed of light. As mentioned earlier, it would require an infinite amount of energy, which is not feasible. Additionally, our understanding of physics suggests that the speed of light is a fundamental limit in the universe and cannot be surpassed.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
831
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
Replies
130
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
939
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
Back
Top