Newton's First Law of Motion

  • Thread starter BlackMamba
  • Start date
  • #1
187
0
I don't understand how to even begin with this problem.

Here it is: An arrow, starting from rest, leaves the bow with a speed of 26.0 m/s. If the average force exerted on the arrow by the bow were doubled, all else remaining the same, with what speed would the arrow leave the bow?

I do know:

Vo = 0
V = 26.0

That's pretty much it. How do I move on from here?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Tide
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,089
0
The force time the distance over which the bow acts on the arrow is the kinetic energy of the arrow when it is released.
 
  • #3
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
10,025
134
Tide said:
The force time the distance over which the bow acts on the arrow is the kinetic energy of the arrow when it is released.
This yields a wrong answer.
You should use:
[tex]\int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}Fdt=\bigtriangleup{mv}[/tex]
 
  • #4
Tide
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,089
0
arildno said:
This yields a wrong answer.
You should use:
[tex]\int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}Fdt=\bigtriangleup{mv}[/tex]

How would you determine the time interval over which to integrate? If you change the force then the time interval of the acceleration necessarily changes too.
 
  • #5
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
10,025
134
You've been given that ALL ELSE is unchanged!
(This would be the time&space intervals)
Now, let's look at the kinetic energy equation:
[tex]\int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}Fvdt=\frac{1}{2}v_{f}^{2}[/tex]
([tex]v_{f}[/tex] final velocity)
By the mean value-theorem, we may rewrite this as:
[tex]v(t*)\int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}Fdt=\frac{1}{2}v_{f}^{2}[/tex]
([tex]t_{0}\leq{t*}\leq{t}_{1}[/tex])

Rewritting in terms of average force, we get:
[tex]v(t*)\hat{F}(t_{1}-t_{0})=\frac{1}{2}v_{f}^{2}[/tex]

Now, you cannot conclude that t* is the same value in the two cases.
(Or for that matter v(t*))
 
  • #6
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
10,025
134
BTW, you criticized my use of the same time interval; I might criticize your approach for using the same space interval.
As I look more at it, I think the exercise is decidedly unclear.

Possibly, they think of modeling the instantaneous force as kx (or 2kx in the second case); if that is true your approach is possibly what they're after.
 
  • #7
Tide
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,089
0
arildno said:
BTW, you criticized my use of the same time interval; I might criticize your approach for using the same space interval.
As I look more at it, I think the exercise is decidedly unclear.

Possibly, they think of modeling the instantaneous force as kx (or 2kx in the second case); if that is true your approach is possibly what they're after.

I didn't criticize. I asked a question and noted a property of bows and arrows which, presumably, one would have to know in order to address a problem relating to bows and arrows. Namely, the distance over which the bow accelerates the arrow is fixed. The time is not.

I agree the statement of the problem is somewhat ambiguous but, more than that, it is in error since it is impossible for ALL ELSE to remain unchanged. If both the distance and time interval over which acceleration occurs remain the same then the force cannot be doubled.
 
  • #8
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
10,025
134
I agree with you, Tide.
I'd like to apologize for using the word "criticize"; the Norwegian "equivalent" is almost neutral, it seems that it is rather more negatively charged in English than I thought.

As for the problem:
As far as I can see, the only way to put some sense in the wording, is that the bowstring is replaced with a stiffer one

For example, with the same displacement of the string, the potential energy would increase.
However, pulling the (new) string further back might keep the actual time interval constant.

In other words, a poorly stated problem..
 
  • #9
Tide
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,089
0
You're right. In English the verb "to criticize" has a slightly different meaning than the more suitable "to question." I wasn't offended by your use of the the word but I just wanted to clarify.

In any case, we do agree on the ambiguity of the problem! Perhaps the original poster can lend some insight based on his or her familiarity with the textbook of professor.
 
  • #10
382
2
[tex]
\begin{multline*}
\begin{split}
&Newton's\ 2nd\ Law\\
&\sum \vec{F}=m\vec{a}\\
&F=m*(\frac{v-u}{t})\\
&F=m*(\frac{26}{t})\\
&F'=m*(\frac{v'-u'}{t})\\
&F'=2F\\
&m*(\frac{v'-u'}{t})=2*m*(\frac{26}{t})\\
&(\frac{v'-0}{t})=2*(\frac{26}{t})\\
&v'=2*26=52\ m/s \\
\end{split}
\end{multline*}
[/tex]
 
  • #11
Tide
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,089
0
Leong,

I don't think you know the times you put in for F and F' are the same.
 
  • #12
382
2
i thought the question said 'all remaining the same' ? can i put this the question this way : if the force is doubled, what is the final velocity of the bow after time t which is the same as the first case ?
 
  • #13
Tide
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,089
0
Leong,

All else cannot remain the same - either the acceleration time changes or how far back you pull the string changes or a combination of both if the average force is to double. That's why Arildno and I concluded it the problem is flawed.
 
  • #14
382
2
opps, i am wrong !
 

Related Threads on Newton's First Law of Motion

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
915
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
927
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
620
Top