Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Newton's method vs. Lambert W

  1. Mar 30, 2010 #1
    I understand the rational for using the Lambert W. function for solving equations such as [tex]x^x = z [/tex], where no derivative in terms of elementary functions exists for the expression. However, on the Wikipedia page about the Lambert W. function, an example is given with the equation [tex]2^t = 5t[/tex]. In this case (since numerical evaluation of the W. function boils down to Newton's method in the end) is there any advantage to using the W. function instead of Newton's method directly to solve the equation, other than just getting it in an explicit formula for t? Thanks!
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 31, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    It depends. I'm not sure if Newton's method can get you the complex solutions, for example. There are always uses for the formal expressions. I recently used the Lambert-W function and its properties in the derivation of a distribution function. In particular, the principal branch W_0 has a series expansion about z = 0 which I used in an integral to get a closed form expression for something.
  4. Mar 31, 2010 #3
    [tex]x^x = z [/tex]

    [tex]xlnx = lnz[/tex]

    [tex]\frac{x}{x} + lnx = 0[/tex]

    [tex]1 + lnx = 0[/tex]

    [tex] lnx = -1[/tex]

    [tex]e^{-1} = x[/tex]
    I'm pretty sure the derivative can be done in elementary functions. Solving for an equation like [tex]
    2^t = 5t
    [/tex] can't be done in elementary functions though.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook